R&D Literature Review September 2022

R&D Literature Review September 2022

BCIS R&D Group Literature Review

September 2022

Prepared by Michael Mahmoudi, Paul Morris and Natalia Briceno
Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

Coronary Artery Disease

No need for routine non-invasive stress testing post-PCI

Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. NEJM 2022; 387:905-915

The optimal follow-up strategy for patients undergoing coronary revascularization who have high-risk characteristics is variable. Some studies have shown that functional testing is widely used in clinical practice with more than half of all such patients having had functional testing within 2 years of revascularization. The POST-PCI investigators conducted a randomized superiority trial to compare an active follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, Exercise electrocardiography) examined whether a follow-up strategy that includes functional testing improved clinical outcomes. Patients (n=1706) who had undergone successful PCI with DES, bioresorbable scaffolds, or drug-coated balloon (for ISR) who had at least one high-risk anatomical feature (left main disease, bifurcation disease, ostial disease, CTO, multivessel disease warranting PCI of at least two vessels, a restenotic lesion, lesion length > 30mm or a lesion warranting a stent length of > 32mm, and bypass graft disease) or clinical characteristics (diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine ≥ 177 mmol/l or long-term haemodialysis, and enzyme positive ACS) were enrolled to a strategy of routine functional testing (n=849) at 1 year post PCI or standard care alone (n=857). Patients underwent routine follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE defined as death from any cause, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. The mean age was 64.7±10.3, 79.5% were men, 21% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had a diffuse long lesion, 38.7% had diabetes, 19.4% had an ACS, 96.4% were treated with DES, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.0, the mean stent length was 57mm, FFR was measured in 35.7% of the patients, and intravascular imaging was used in 74.4%. At 2 years, the primary endpoint was similar in the functional testing and standard care groups (5.5% vs. 6.0%; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.35; p=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, invasive angiography had been undertaken in 12.3% of the functional testing group and 9.3% of the standard care group (p=0.62) had undergone invasive angiography. The rates of revascularization were also similar in the two groups (8.1% vs. 5.8%; p>0.05).

 

Reviving a failing heart with PCI

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic ventricular dysfunction.

NEJM 2022 Online

The benefits of coronary revascularization in patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains uncertain. A survival benefit in patients undergoing CABG in this population became apparent only after 10 years in the STICH trial. The REVIVED investigators examined whether coronary revascularization with PCI in addition to guideline directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n=347) as compared to OMT alone (n=353) improved event-free survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, extensive coronary artery disease (BCIS jeopardy score ≥ 6) and myocardial viability in at least four dysfunctional segments amenable to revascularization with PCI. The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The major secondary outcomes were LVEF at 6 and 12 months, KCCQ overall summary score, the score on the EQ-5D-5L score, and NYHA functional class. The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Median age was 70 years, 88% were men, 77% had NYHA class I/II, and 67% had no angina. The primary outcome occurred in 37.2% of the PCI plus OMT group and 38% of the OMT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.27; p=0.96). The rates of death (31.7% vs. 32.6%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.27) and hospitalization for heart failure (14.7% vs. 15.3%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43) were similar in the PCI plus OMT and OMT groups. The LVEF was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.7-0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference; 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7-3.4). Quality of life scores at 6 and 12 months favoured the PCI group but this difference diminished at 24 months. Of note, approximately 50% of the patients had 2V CAD and a median of two lesions and vessels were treated per patient which may be out of proportion to the extent of LV dysfunction. Other salient features include lack of description of the severity of stenoses, physiological assessment of the lesion, and lack of correlation of stenosis with previous ischemic/viability testing.

Secure compliance with the polypill

Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

NEJM 2022; 387:967-977

Noncompliance with guideline directed optimal medical therapy is a frequently observed challenge faced by patients and healthcare providers. This is often associated with adverse clinical outcomes particularly in patients at the highest risk of adverse clinical events. A polypill strategy has been shown to improve compliance and lower cardiovascular event rates in trials of primary prevention.  The SECURE trial was a randomized phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy of a polypill strategy, as compared with standard care, with respect to major cardiovascular outcomes (defined as CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) in patients older than 75 years of age or at least 65 years of age with at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, mild or moderate renal disease defined as creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2 of body surface area, previous MI, previous coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), or previous stroke. All patients had to have had a history of type 1 MI within the previous 6 months. The polypill contained any of three formulations Polypill AAR40-a single pill containing aspirin 100mg, ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10mg, and atorvastatin 40mg. The dose of the atorvastatin could be reduced to 20mg on clinical grounds in which case the Polypill AAR20 was used (same as AAR40 but reduced dose of atorvastatin at 20mg). In patients who were not on ramipril at baseline, treatment was commenced at 2.5mg; in those who were already on an ACE inhibitor, treatment was commenced at the equivalent dose of ramipril with the aim of reaching 10mg. Follow-up was undertaken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. At 6 and 24 months, adherence was checked using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. A total of 2499 patients were randomized (polypill=1258, standard care=1241). The median time between the index MI and randomization was 8 days. The mean age was 76±6.6 years, 31% were female, 77.9% had hypertension, 57.4% had diabetes, 51.3% had a history of smoking, mean systolic blood pressure was 129.1±17.7, and mean LDL was 89.2±37.2. Most patients in the polypill group (91.7%) received the 40mg formulation of atorvastatin as compared to 40.4% in the standard care group. 98.7% of patients in the standard care group received aspirin and 95.1% received an additional antiplatelet agent as compared to 94% in the polypill group. The primary endpoint was lower in the polypill group (9.5% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.76; 95% CI; 0.60-0.96; p=0.02). All components of the composite outcome except for urgent revascularization were reduced in a consistent manner. The secondary outcome of CV death, MI, or stroke was also lower in the polypill group (8.2% vs. 11.7%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90); p=0.005). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (9.3% vs. 9.5%; p=0.79). Adherence was higher in the polypill group both at 6 months (70.6% vs. 62.7%; RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.20) and 24 months (74.1% vs. 63.2%; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25).

Routine pressure wire assessment not supported by RIPCORD-2

Routine pressure wire assessment versus conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease: The RIPCORD 2 trial.

Circ 2022 Online

FFR-guided PCI has been shown to be associated lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography guidance alone. The value of FFR of all major coronary vessels at the time diagnostic angiography has not been established. The RIPCORD 2 trial was an 1100 patient prospective, multicentre, randomized trial that compared a strategy of coronary angiography alone versus coronary angiography + routine FFR assessment of all epicardial vessels of sufficient size amenable to revascularization to determine whether the latter strategy was associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome. In the angiography + FFR group, the median number of vessels examined was 4. There were no differences in the median hospital costs between the two groups (£4136 for angiography vs. £4510 for angiography + FFR; p=0.137) nor the median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (75 vs. 75; p=0.88). The number of clinical events were death (5 vs. 8), stroke (3 vs. 4), MI (23 vs. 22), and unplanned revascularization (26 vs. 33) with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% for angiography versus 9.5% for angiography + FFR (p=0.64). The study thus concluded that routine FFR at the stage of diagnostic angiography is not associated with reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life.

Alirocumab has favourable effects on plaque composition

Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infraction. The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1771-81

PCSK inhibitors have been shown to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and improve clinical outcomes in patients with recent ACS. The PACMAN-AMI trial examined whether the addition of alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy affected coronary atherosclerotic plaques in the non-infracted related arteries. Following PCU of the culprit lesion in the infarct related artery (IRA), eligible patients underwent intracoronary imaging of the non-IRA with OCT, IVUS and NIRS, and then randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 150mg alirocumab (n=148) or placebo (n=152) biweekly via subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks.  Both groups also received rosuvastatin 20mg daily. Main inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, successful PCI of the culprit vessel (STEMI=53%, NSTEMI=47%), suitability for intracoronary imaging with angiographic stenosis between 20-50% in the proximal segments of two non-IRAs, and LDL-C at baseline ≥ 125 mg/dl if not on a statin for 4 weeks prior to presentation or ≥ 70mg/dl if on a stable dose of a statin. Key exclusion criteria were left main or three vessel disease, history of CABG, severe chronic kidney or liver disease, and known statin intolerance. The mean age was 58 years, 18% were female, 10% were diabetic, and mean LDL-C was 152.4 mg/dl. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of change in mean percent atheroma volume from baseline for alirocumab was greater than placebo -2.13% vs. -0.92% (p<0.001). Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was −79.42 with alirocumab vs. −37.60 with placebo (difference, −41.24; 95% CI: −70.71 to −11.77; p= 0.006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67μm with alirocumab vs. 33.19μm with placebo (difference, 29.65μm; 95% CI: 11.75-47.55; p=0.001). Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs. 72.8% of patients receiving placebo. The change in LDL-C from baseline was -131.2 mg/dl in the alirocumab group vs. -76.5 mg/dl in the placebo group (p<0.001).

 

Valvular Heart Disease

Embolic protection remains a challenge

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. NEJM 2022 Online

Embolization of biological material from either the aortic valve and/or the aorta may cause a periprocedural stroke in 2-2.5% of patients undergoing TAVI. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in capturing debris in 99% of patients but the reduction in new cerebral lesion volume was not significant. The PROTECTED TAVR trial was a prospective, postmarket, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Sentinal CEP in reducing stroke within 72 hours of transfemoral TAVI or before discharge. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of a focal or global neurologic dysfunction caused by vascular injury to the brain, spinal cord, or retina leading to haemorrhage or infarction. Disabling stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, delirium, major or minor vascular complications at the CEP access site, and acute kidney injury were also assessed.  Patients (n=3000) were eligible if they had AS and were scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVI using a commercially available device. Patients were excluded if they had left common carotid or brachiocephalic artery stenosis >70% or the anatomical structure was unfavourable for placement of the CEP device. The mean age was 78.9±7.8 years, mean STS score 3.4±2.7, 40% were female, history of CVA/TIA was present in 8%, 8% had bicuspid AS, 3% had valve-in-valve procedure, a balloon expandable device was used in 64%, and duration of follow-up was 72 hours. The primary outcome was similar in the CEP and control groups (2.3% vs. 2.9%; difference -0.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7 to 0.5; p=0.30). The rates of secondary outcomes for CEP and control groups were disabling stoke (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.05), all-cause mortality (0.5% vs. 0.3%), stroke/TIA/delirium (3.1% vs. 3.7%), and acute kidney injury (0.5% vs. 0.5%).

Potential additional mechanism for stroke in TAVI patients

Cerebral microbleeds during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging cohort.

Circ 2022; 146:383-397

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in elderly people and yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. The incidence of new CMBs and factors contributing to their formation in patients undergoing TAVI has not been previously examined. The current study prospectively examined a cohort of 84 patients with severe aortic stenosis that were referred for TAVI. Mean age was 80.9±5.7 years and 53% were female. On preprocedural MRI, 26% of the patients had at least 1 CMBs whilst following TAVI, new CMBs was observed in 23% of patients. In univariate analysis, a previous history of bleeding (p=0.01), higher total dose of heparin (p=0.02), a prolonged procedure (p=0.03), no protamine reversal (p=0.04), higher final ACT (p=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high molecular weight: multimer ratio (p=0.007) and lower final closure time with ADP (p=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. In multivariate analysis, a prolonged procedure for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time (p=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect for every lower 0.1 unit of high molecular weight: ratio (p=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. Of note, new CMBs were not associated with changes in neurological outcome or quality of life at 6 months follow-up.

UK TAVI provides additional support for TAVI in the lower risk surgical patients

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. A randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887

TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is being increasingly supported by data from randomized clinical trials. The UK TAVI trial examined whether TAVI was noninferior to SAVR in 913 patients (TAVI=458, SAVR=458) aged 70 years or older with severe symptomatic AS and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity. Key exclusion criteria were life expectancy < 1-year, previous AVR or TAVI, technically unsuitable for TAVI or SAVR, CAD for which surgical revascularization was required, primary aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation. Other salient features included mean LV ejection fraction=5.7%, transfemoral access=92%, conscious sedation during TAVI=70%, 45% received the Sapien 3 valve, 14% Evolut/Evolut R, and 10% Lotus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. There were 36 secondary outcomes including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding, vascular complications, requirement for a pacemaker, and aortic regurgitation. The median age was 81 years, 46% were female, median STS score was 2.6%, and 99.9% completed follow-up. At 1-year, mortality was 4.6% in the TAVI group and 6.6% in the surgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: −∞ to 1.2%; p < .001 for noninferiority). Of the 30 prespecified secondary outcomes, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with shorter hospital stay (median of 3 days vs. 8 days). TAVI was also associated with significantly lower bleeding complications (7.2% vs. 20.2%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs. 2.4%; HR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.54-7.71), pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs. 7.3%; HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), and mild (38.3% vs. 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs. 0.6%) aortic regurgitation. The rates of stroke were similar in the TAVI and SAVR groups (2.3% vs. 0.6%).

Expanding techniques for treating severe TR

6-Month outcomes of the TricValve sytem in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: the TRICUS EURO study.

JACC Cardiol Interv 2022; 15:1366-77

Bicaval valve implantation (CAVI) has emerged as a novel transcatheter strategy for indirectly treating the systemic manifestation of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients ineligible for cardiac surgery or edge-to-edge repair. The Tricvalve system consists of 2 self-expanding valves designed for the SVC and IVC premounted in a 27.5-F delivery system. Caval anchoring is based on stent design, radial force, and the degree of oversizing. The TRICUS EURO study was a nonblind, nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter, prospective trial of 35 patients with symptomatic severe TR (grade ≥3 in a 5-grade classification) despite optimal medical therapy and NYHA functional class III or IV. The main exclusion criteria included severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP≥65mmHg) and/or significant renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine >3mg/dl). The primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) improvement measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up. The mean age was 76 ± 6.8 years, 83% were female, 20% were diabetic, and the overall EuroSCORE II was 5.8 ± 4.2. At 30 days, procedural success was 94%, with no procedural death or conversion to surgery. At 6 months, patients had a significant improvement in QoL from 42.01 ± 22.3 to 59.7 ± 23.6 (p=0.004) correlating with a significant improvement in NYHA class with 79.4% of patients noted to be in class I or II (p=0.0006). The rates of 6-month all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 8.5% and 20% respectively. There were 6 cases of major bleeding and 2 were access site related. The study represents the first comprehensive short-term analysis of a dedicated CAVI system and longer-term data are required to assess clinical benefits and haemodynamic effects upon the pulmonary and right heart status.

 

Miscellaneous

Hydration remains key for renal protection

Study evaluating the use of RenalGuard to protect patients at high risk of AKI. JACC 2022; 15:1639-48

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may occur in 2-7% of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. A variety of measures including hydration with sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and hemofiltration have been examined in randomized trials but no measure except adequate intravenous (IV) hydration and minimal contrast use have been shown to be effective strategies. The RenalGuard system (RG) is a device that delivers real-time isotonic IV hydration matched with frusemide-induced diuresis allowing hydration and contrast clearance thus preventing fluid overload and volume depletion. The STRENGTH study examined the superiority of RG over standard practice (considering the ESC guidelines including IV and oral hydration, the dose of contrast medium and staged procedure if necessary) in 259 patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 15-40 ml/min/m2) requiring complex coronary, structural, or peripheral procedures with an expected contrast injection of at least 3x the estimated GFR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dl and/or an increase of 25% of basal value at around day 3 or the requirement for dialysis within 5 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included a change in serum creatinine value and GFR at 12 months, % of patients on temporary or chronic haemodialysis at 12 months, and MACCEs. In the whole population, the mean age was 79 years, 50% were male, baseline GFR was 32ml/min/1.73m2, 48% underwent PCI, 34% structural intervention (TAVI and LAA closure), and 18% peripheral intervention. The mean amount of contrast use was similar in both groups (116ml in the RG group vs. 104ml in the control group; p=0.26). The total fluid intake was higher in the RG group (6196ml vs. 1407ml; p<0.0001). The primary endpoint was similar in the RG and control groups (15.9% vs. 13.9%; difference=2.4; 95% CI:-7.1-12; p=0.62). At 12 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The rate of MACCEs were also similar at a median of 342 days (20.5% in RG group vs. 22.2% in the control group).

R&D Literature Review JUNE 2022

R&D Literature Review JUNE 2022

BCIS R&D Group Literature Review

September 2022

Prepared by Michael Mahmoudi, Paul Morris and Natalia Briceno
Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

Coronary Artery Disease

No need for routine non-invasive stress testing post-PCI

Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. NEJM 2022; 387:905-915

The optimal follow-up strategy for patients undergoing coronary revascularization who have high-risk characteristics is variable. Some studies have shown that functional testing is widely used in clinical practice with more than half of all such patients having had functional testing within 2 years of revascularization. The POST-PCI investigators conducted a randomized superiority trial to compare an active follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, Exercise electrocardiography) examined whether a follow-up strategy that includes functional testing improved clinical outcomes. Patients (n=1706) who had undergone successful PCI with DES, bioresorbable scaffolds, or drug-coated balloon (for ISR) who had at least one high-risk anatomical feature (left main disease, bifurcation disease, ostial disease, CTO, multivessel disease warranting PCI of at least two vessels, a restenotic lesion, lesion length > 30mm or a lesion warranting a stent length of > 32mm, and bypass graft disease) or clinical characteristics (diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine ≥ 177 mmol/l or long-term haemodialysis, and enzyme positive ACS) were enrolled to a strategy of routine functional testing (n=849) at 1 year post PCI or standard care alone (n=857). Patients underwent routine follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE defined as death from any cause, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. The mean age was 64.7±10.3, 79.5% were men, 21% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had a diffuse long lesion, 38.7% had diabetes, 19.4% had an ACS, 96.4% were treated with DES, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.0, the mean stent length was 57mm, FFR was measured in 35.7% of the patients, and intravascular imaging was used in 74.4%. At 2 years, the primary endpoint was similar in the functional testing and standard care groups (5.5% vs. 6.0%; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.35; p=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, invasive angiography had been undertaken in 12.3% of the functional testing group and 9.3% of the standard care group (p=0.62) had undergone invasive angiography. The rates of revascularization were also similar in the two groups (8.1% vs. 5.8%; p>0.05).

 

Reviving a failing heart with PCI

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic ventricular dysfunction.

NEJM 2022 Online

The benefits of coronary revascularization in patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains uncertain. A survival benefit in patients undergoing CABG in this population became apparent only after 10 years in the STICH trial. The REVIVED investigators examined whether coronary revascularization with PCI in addition to guideline directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n=347) as compared to OMT alone (n=353) improved event-free survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, extensive coronary artery disease (BCIS jeopardy score ≥ 6) and myocardial viability in at least four dysfunctional segments amenable to revascularization with PCI. The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The major secondary outcomes were LVEF at 6 and 12 months, KCCQ overall summary score, the score on the EQ-5D-5L score, and NYHA functional class. The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Median age was 70 years, 88% were men, 77% had NYHA class I/II, and 67% had no angina. The primary outcome occurred in 37.2% of the PCI plus OMT group and 38% of the OMT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.27; p=0.96). The rates of death (31.7% vs. 32.6%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.27) and hospitalization for heart failure (14.7% vs. 15.3%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43) were similar in the PCI plus OMT and OMT groups. The LVEF was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.7-0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference; 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7-3.4). Quality of life scores at 6 and 12 months favoured the PCI group but this difference diminished at 24 months. Of note, approximately 50% of the patients had 2V CAD and a median of two lesions and vessels were treated per patient which may be out of proportion to the extent of LV dysfunction. Other salient features include lack of description of the severity of stenoses, physiological assessment of the lesion, and lack of correlation of stenosis with previous ischemic/viability testing.

Secure compliance with the polypill

Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

NEJM 2022; 387:967-977

Noncompliance with guideline directed optimal medical therapy is a frequently observed challenge faced by patients and healthcare providers. This is often associated with adverse clinical outcomes particularly in patients at the highest risk of adverse clinical events. A polypill strategy has been shown to improve compliance and lower cardiovascular event rates in trials of primary prevention.  The SECURE trial was a randomized phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy of a polypill strategy, as compared with standard care, with respect to major cardiovascular outcomes (defined as CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) in patients older than 75 years of age or at least 65 years of age with at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, mild or moderate renal disease defined as creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2 of body surface area, previous MI, previous coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), or previous stroke. All patients had to have had a history of type 1 MI within the previous 6 months. The polypill contained any of three formulations Polypill AAR40-a single pill containing aspirin 100mg, ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10mg, and atorvastatin 40mg. The dose of the atorvastatin could be reduced to 20mg on clinical grounds in which case the Polypill AAR20 was used (same as AAR40 but reduced dose of atorvastatin at 20mg). In patients who were not on ramipril at baseline, treatment was commenced at 2.5mg; in those who were already on an ACE inhibitor, treatment was commenced at the equivalent dose of ramipril with the aim of reaching 10mg. Follow-up was undertaken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. At 6 and 24 months, adherence was checked using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. A total of 2499 patients were randomized (polypill=1258, standard care=1241). The median time between the index MI and randomization was 8 days. The mean age was 76±6.6 years, 31% were female, 77.9% had hypertension, 57.4% had diabetes, 51.3% had a history of smoking, mean systolic blood pressure was 129.1±17.7, and mean LDL was 89.2±37.2. Most patients in the polypill group (91.7%) received the 40mg formulation of atorvastatin as compared to 40.4% in the standard care group. 98.7% of patients in the standard care group received aspirin and 95.1% received an additional antiplatelet agent as compared to 94% in the polypill group. The primary endpoint was lower in the polypill group (9.5% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.76; 95% CI; 0.60-0.96; p=0.02). All components of the composite outcome except for urgent revascularization were reduced in a consistent manner. The secondary outcome of CV death, MI, or stroke was also lower in the polypill group (8.2% vs. 11.7%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90); p=0.005). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (9.3% vs. 9.5%; p=0.79). Adherence was higher in the polypill group both at 6 months (70.6% vs. 62.7%; RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.20) and 24 months (74.1% vs. 63.2%; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25).

Routine pressure wire assessment not supported by RIPCORD-2

Routine pressure wire assessment versus conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease: The RIPCORD 2 trial.

Circ 2022 Online

FFR-guided PCI has been shown to be associated lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography guidance alone. The value of FFR of all major coronary vessels at the time diagnostic angiography has not been established. The RIPCORD 2 trial was an 1100 patient prospective, multicentre, randomized trial that compared a strategy of coronary angiography alone versus coronary angiography + routine FFR assessment of all epicardial vessels of sufficient size amenable to revascularization to determine whether the latter strategy was associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome. In the angiography + FFR group, the median number of vessels examined was 4. There were no differences in the median hospital costs between the two groups (£4136 for angiography vs. £4510 for angiography + FFR; p=0.137) nor the median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (75 vs. 75; p=0.88). The number of clinical events were death (5 vs. 8), stroke (3 vs. 4), MI (23 vs. 22), and unplanned revascularization (26 vs. 33) with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% for angiography versus 9.5% for angiography + FFR (p=0.64). The study thus concluded that routine FFR at the stage of diagnostic angiography is not associated with reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life.

Alirocumab has favourable effects on plaque composition

Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infraction. The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1771-81

PCSK inhibitors have been shown to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and improve clinical outcomes in patients with recent ACS. The PACMAN-AMI trial examined whether the addition of alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy affected coronary atherosclerotic plaques in the non-infracted related arteries. Following PCU of the culprit lesion in the infarct related artery (IRA), eligible patients underwent intracoronary imaging of the non-IRA with OCT, IVUS and NIRS, and then randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 150mg alirocumab (n=148) or placebo (n=152) biweekly via subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks.  Both groups also received rosuvastatin 20mg daily. Main inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, successful PCI of the culprit vessel (STEMI=53%, NSTEMI=47%), suitability for intracoronary imaging with angiographic stenosis between 20-50% in the proximal segments of two non-IRAs, and LDL-C at baseline ≥ 125 mg/dl if not on a statin for 4 weeks prior to presentation or ≥ 70mg/dl if on a stable dose of a statin. Key exclusion criteria were left main or three vessel disease, history of CABG, severe chronic kidney or liver disease, and known statin intolerance. The mean age was 58 years, 18% were female, 10% were diabetic, and mean LDL-C was 152.4 mg/dl. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of change in mean percent atheroma volume from baseline for alirocumab was greater than placebo -2.13% vs. -0.92% (p<0.001). Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was −79.42 with alirocumab vs. −37.60 with placebo (difference, −41.24; 95% CI: −70.71 to −11.77; p= 0.006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67μm with alirocumab vs. 33.19μm with placebo (difference, 29.65μm; 95% CI: 11.75-47.55; p=0.001). Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs. 72.8% of patients receiving placebo. The change in LDL-C from baseline was -131.2 mg/dl in the alirocumab group vs. -76.5 mg/dl in the placebo group (p<0.001).

 

Valvular Heart Disease

Embolic protection remains a challenge

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. NEJM 2022 Online

Embolization of biological material from either the aortic valve and/or the aorta may cause a periprocedural stroke in 2-2.5% of patients undergoing TAVI. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in capturing debris in 99% of patients but the reduction in new cerebral lesion volume was not significant. The PROTECTED TAVR trial was a prospective, postmarket, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Sentinal CEP in reducing stroke within 72 hours of transfemoral TAVI or before discharge. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of a focal or global neurologic dysfunction caused by vascular injury to the brain, spinal cord, or retina leading to haemorrhage or infarction. Disabling stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, delirium, major or minor vascular complications at the CEP access site, and acute kidney injury were also assessed.  Patients (n=3000) were eligible if they had AS and were scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVI using a commercially available device. Patients were excluded if they had left common carotid or brachiocephalic artery stenosis >70% or the anatomical structure was unfavourable for placement of the CEP device. The mean age was 78.9±7.8 years, mean STS score 3.4±2.7, 40% were female, history of CVA/TIA was present in 8%, 8% had bicuspid AS, 3% had valve-in-valve procedure, a balloon expandable device was used in 64%, and duration of follow-up was 72 hours. The primary outcome was similar in the CEP and control groups (2.3% vs. 2.9%; difference -0.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7 to 0.5; p=0.30). The rates of secondary outcomes for CEP and control groups were disabling stoke (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.05), all-cause mortality (0.5% vs. 0.3%), stroke/TIA/delirium (3.1% vs. 3.7%), and acute kidney injury (0.5% vs. 0.5%).

Potential additional mechanism for stroke in TAVI patients

Cerebral microbleeds during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging cohort.

Circ 2022; 146:383-397

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in elderly people and yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. The incidence of new CMBs and factors contributing to their formation in patients undergoing TAVI has not been previously examined. The current study prospectively examined a cohort of 84 patients with severe aortic stenosis that were referred for TAVI. Mean age was 80.9±5.7 years and 53% were female. On preprocedural MRI, 26% of the patients had at least 1 CMBs whilst following TAVI, new CMBs was observed in 23% of patients. In univariate analysis, a previous history of bleeding (p=0.01), higher total dose of heparin (p=0.02), a prolonged procedure (p=0.03), no protamine reversal (p=0.04), higher final ACT (p=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high molecular weight: multimer ratio (p=0.007) and lower final closure time with ADP (p=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. In multivariate analysis, a prolonged procedure for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time (p=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect for every lower 0.1 unit of high molecular weight: ratio (p=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. Of note, new CMBs were not associated with changes in neurological outcome or quality of life at 6 months follow-up.

UK TAVI provides additional support for TAVI in the lower risk surgical patients

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. A randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887

TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is being increasingly supported by data from randomized clinical trials. The UK TAVI trial examined whether TAVI was noninferior to SAVR in 913 patients (TAVI=458, SAVR=458) aged 70 years or older with severe symptomatic AS and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity. Key exclusion criteria were life expectancy < 1-year, previous AVR or TAVI, technically unsuitable for TAVI or SAVR, CAD for which surgical revascularization was required, primary aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation. Other salient features included mean LV ejection fraction=5.7%, transfemoral access=92%, conscious sedation during TAVI=70%, 45% received the Sapien 3 valve, 14% Evolut/Evolut R, and 10% Lotus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. There were 36 secondary outcomes including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding, vascular complications, requirement for a pacemaker, and aortic regurgitation. The median age was 81 years, 46% were female, median STS score was 2.6%, and 99.9% completed follow-up. At 1-year, mortality was 4.6% in the TAVI group and 6.6% in the surgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: −∞ to 1.2%; p < .001 for noninferiority). Of the 30 prespecified secondary outcomes, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with shorter hospital stay (median of 3 days vs. 8 days). TAVI was also associated with significantly lower bleeding complications (7.2% vs. 20.2%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs. 2.4%; HR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.54-7.71), pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs. 7.3%; HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), and mild (38.3% vs. 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs. 0.6%) aortic regurgitation. The rates of stroke were similar in the TAVI and SAVR groups (2.3% vs. 0.6%).

Expanding techniques for treating severe TR

6-Month outcomes of the TricValve sytem in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: the TRICUS EURO study.

JACC Cardiol Interv 2022; 15:1366-77

Bicaval valve implantation (CAVI) has emerged as a novel transcatheter strategy for indirectly treating the systemic manifestation of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients ineligible for cardiac surgery or edge-to-edge repair. The Tricvalve system consists of 2 self-expanding valves designed for the SVC and IVC premounted in a 27.5-F delivery system. Caval anchoring is based on stent design, radial force, and the degree of oversizing. The TRICUS EURO study was a nonblind, nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter, prospective trial of 35 patients with symptomatic severe TR (grade ≥3 in a 5-grade classification) despite optimal medical therapy and NYHA functional class III or IV. The main exclusion criteria included severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP≥65mmHg) and/or significant renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine >3mg/dl). The primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) improvement measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up. The mean age was 76 ± 6.8 years, 83% were female, 20% were diabetic, and the overall EuroSCORE II was 5.8 ± 4.2. At 30 days, procedural success was 94%, with no procedural death or conversion to surgery. At 6 months, patients had a significant improvement in QoL from 42.01 ± 22.3 to 59.7 ± 23.6 (p=0.004) correlating with a significant improvement in NYHA class with 79.4% of patients noted to be in class I or II (p=0.0006). The rates of 6-month all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 8.5% and 20% respectively. There were 6 cases of major bleeding and 2 were access site related. The study represents the first comprehensive short-term analysis of a dedicated CAVI system and longer-term data are required to assess clinical benefits and haemodynamic effects upon the pulmonary and right heart status.

 

Miscellaneous

Hydration remains key for renal protection

Study evaluating the use of RenalGuard to protect patients at high risk of AKI. JACC 2022; 15:1639-48

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may occur in 2-7% of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. A variety of measures including hydration with sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and hemofiltration have been examined in randomized trials but no measure except adequate intravenous (IV) hydration and minimal contrast use have been shown to be effective strategies. The RenalGuard system (RG) is a device that delivers real-time isotonic IV hydration matched with frusemide-induced diuresis allowing hydration and contrast clearance thus preventing fluid overload and volume depletion. The STRENGTH study examined the superiority of RG over standard practice (considering the ESC guidelines including IV and oral hydration, the dose of contrast medium and staged procedure if necessary) in 259 patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 15-40 ml/min/m2) requiring complex coronary, structural, or peripheral procedures with an expected contrast injection of at least 3x the estimated GFR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dl and/or an increase of 25% of basal value at around day 3 or the requirement for dialysis within 5 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included a change in serum creatinine value and GFR at 12 months, % of patients on temporary or chronic haemodialysis at 12 months, and MACCEs. In the whole population, the mean age was 79 years, 50% were male, baseline GFR was 32ml/min/1.73m2, 48% underwent PCI, 34% structural intervention (TAVI and LAA closure), and 18% peripheral intervention. The mean amount of contrast use was similar in both groups (116ml in the RG group vs. 104ml in the control group; p=0.26). The total fluid intake was higher in the RG group (6196ml vs. 1407ml; p<0.0001). The primary endpoint was similar in the RG and control groups (15.9% vs. 13.9%; difference=2.4; 95% CI:-7.1-12; p=0.62). At 12 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The rate of MACCEs were also similar at a median of 342 days (20.5% in RG group vs. 22.2% in the control group).

Launch of Acute Aortic Dissection Pathway Toolkit

Launch of Acute Aortic Dissection Pathway Toolkit

Dear stakeholder

Launch of Acute Aortic Dissection Pathway Toolkit

We are pleased to let you know that we have launched NHS England and NHS Improvement’s new Acute Aortic Dissection (AAD) Pathway Toolkit. This consists of three separate documents which you will find attached. These are:
– Acute Aortic Dissection Toolkit Final Version 20220314
– 45.2a AAD Toolkit Interaction pdf
– 45.2b AAD Self-Assessment Questionnaire

The toolkit aims to improve patient outcomes through optimising the pathway from the point of diagnosis to definitive care and is underpinned by 7 key principles.

The toolkit has been developed as part of the work programme of the Vascular and Cardiac Clinical Reference Groups and is one of the products of the Cardiac Pathway Improvement Programme (CPIP). It is primarily a resource for those delivering cardiac services and is not intended to be a patient-facing resource, however we are very grateful for the range of patient groups and people with experience of acute aortic dissection who have supported its development, alongside clinical experts. The toolkit will be housed on the FutureNHS platform – an online workspace for NHS staff.

Kind regards,

Tarana Akther (she / her)
Project Manager 
Specialised Commissioning, Service Transformation Programme
NHS England and NHS Improvement

R&D Literature Review January 2022

R&D Literature Review January 2022

BCIS R&D Group Literature Review

September 2022

Prepared by Michael Mahmoudi, Paul Morris and Natalia Briceno
Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

Coronary Artery Disease

No need for routine non-invasive stress testing post-PCI

Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. NEJM 2022; 387:905-915

The optimal follow-up strategy for patients undergoing coronary revascularization who have high-risk characteristics is variable. Some studies have shown that functional testing is widely used in clinical practice with more than half of all such patients having had functional testing within 2 years of revascularization. The POST-PCI investigators conducted a randomized superiority trial to compare an active follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, Exercise electrocardiography) examined whether a follow-up strategy that includes functional testing improved clinical outcomes. Patients (n=1706) who had undergone successful PCI with DES, bioresorbable scaffolds, or drug-coated balloon (for ISR) who had at least one high-risk anatomical feature (left main disease, bifurcation disease, ostial disease, CTO, multivessel disease warranting PCI of at least two vessels, a restenotic lesion, lesion length > 30mm or a lesion warranting a stent length of > 32mm, and bypass graft disease) or clinical characteristics (diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine ≥ 177 mmol/l or long-term haemodialysis, and enzyme positive ACS) were enrolled to a strategy of routine functional testing (n=849) at 1 year post PCI or standard care alone (n=857). Patients underwent routine follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE defined as death from any cause, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. The mean age was 64.7±10.3, 79.5% were men, 21% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had a diffuse long lesion, 38.7% had diabetes, 19.4% had an ACS, 96.4% were treated with DES, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.0, the mean stent length was 57mm, FFR was measured in 35.7% of the patients, and intravascular imaging was used in 74.4%. At 2 years, the primary endpoint was similar in the functional testing and standard care groups (5.5% vs. 6.0%; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.35; p=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, invasive angiography had been undertaken in 12.3% of the functional testing group and 9.3% of the standard care group (p=0.62) had undergone invasive angiography. The rates of revascularization were also similar in the two groups (8.1% vs. 5.8%; p>0.05).

 

Reviving a failing heart with PCI

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic ventricular dysfunction.

NEJM 2022 Online

The benefits of coronary revascularization in patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains uncertain. A survival benefit in patients undergoing CABG in this population became apparent only after 10 years in the STICH trial. The REVIVED investigators examined whether coronary revascularization with PCI in addition to guideline directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n=347) as compared to OMT alone (n=353) improved event-free survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, extensive coronary artery disease (BCIS jeopardy score ≥ 6) and myocardial viability in at least four dysfunctional segments amenable to revascularization with PCI. The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The major secondary outcomes were LVEF at 6 and 12 months, KCCQ overall summary score, the score on the EQ-5D-5L score, and NYHA functional class. The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Median age was 70 years, 88% were men, 77% had NYHA class I/II, and 67% had no angina. The primary outcome occurred in 37.2% of the PCI plus OMT group and 38% of the OMT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.27; p=0.96). The rates of death (31.7% vs. 32.6%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.27) and hospitalization for heart failure (14.7% vs. 15.3%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43) were similar in the PCI plus OMT and OMT groups. The LVEF was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.7-0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference; 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7-3.4). Quality of life scores at 6 and 12 months favoured the PCI group but this difference diminished at 24 months. Of note, approximately 50% of the patients had 2V CAD and a median of two lesions and vessels were treated per patient which may be out of proportion to the extent of LV dysfunction. Other salient features include lack of description of the severity of stenoses, physiological assessment of the lesion, and lack of correlation of stenosis with previous ischemic/viability testing.

Secure compliance with the polypill

Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

NEJM 2022; 387:967-977

Noncompliance with guideline directed optimal medical therapy is a frequently observed challenge faced by patients and healthcare providers. This is often associated with adverse clinical outcomes particularly in patients at the highest risk of adverse clinical events. A polypill strategy has been shown to improve compliance and lower cardiovascular event rates in trials of primary prevention.  The SECURE trial was a randomized phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy of a polypill strategy, as compared with standard care, with respect to major cardiovascular outcomes (defined as CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) in patients older than 75 years of age or at least 65 years of age with at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, mild or moderate renal disease defined as creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2 of body surface area, previous MI, previous coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), or previous stroke. All patients had to have had a history of type 1 MI within the previous 6 months. The polypill contained any of three formulations Polypill AAR40-a single pill containing aspirin 100mg, ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10mg, and atorvastatin 40mg. The dose of the atorvastatin could be reduced to 20mg on clinical grounds in which case the Polypill AAR20 was used (same as AAR40 but reduced dose of atorvastatin at 20mg). In patients who were not on ramipril at baseline, treatment was commenced at 2.5mg; in those who were already on an ACE inhibitor, treatment was commenced at the equivalent dose of ramipril with the aim of reaching 10mg. Follow-up was undertaken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. At 6 and 24 months, adherence was checked using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. A total of 2499 patients were randomized (polypill=1258, standard care=1241). The median time between the index MI and randomization was 8 days. The mean age was 76±6.6 years, 31% were female, 77.9% had hypertension, 57.4% had diabetes, 51.3% had a history of smoking, mean systolic blood pressure was 129.1±17.7, and mean LDL was 89.2±37.2. Most patients in the polypill group (91.7%) received the 40mg formulation of atorvastatin as compared to 40.4% in the standard care group. 98.7% of patients in the standard care group received aspirin and 95.1% received an additional antiplatelet agent as compared to 94% in the polypill group. The primary endpoint was lower in the polypill group (9.5% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.76; 95% CI; 0.60-0.96; p=0.02). All components of the composite outcome except for urgent revascularization were reduced in a consistent manner. The secondary outcome of CV death, MI, or stroke was also lower in the polypill group (8.2% vs. 11.7%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90); p=0.005). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (9.3% vs. 9.5%; p=0.79). Adherence was higher in the polypill group both at 6 months (70.6% vs. 62.7%; RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.20) and 24 months (74.1% vs. 63.2%; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25).

Routine pressure wire assessment not supported by RIPCORD-2

Routine pressure wire assessment versus conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease: The RIPCORD 2 trial.

Circ 2022 Online

FFR-guided PCI has been shown to be associated lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography guidance alone. The value of FFR of all major coronary vessels at the time diagnostic angiography has not been established. The RIPCORD 2 trial was an 1100 patient prospective, multicentre, randomized trial that compared a strategy of coronary angiography alone versus coronary angiography + routine FFR assessment of all epicardial vessels of sufficient size amenable to revascularization to determine whether the latter strategy was associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome. In the angiography + FFR group, the median number of vessels examined was 4. There were no differences in the median hospital costs between the two groups (£4136 for angiography vs. £4510 for angiography + FFR; p=0.137) nor the median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (75 vs. 75; p=0.88). The number of clinical events were death (5 vs. 8), stroke (3 vs. 4), MI (23 vs. 22), and unplanned revascularization (26 vs. 33) with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% for angiography versus 9.5% for angiography + FFR (p=0.64). The study thus concluded that routine FFR at the stage of diagnostic angiography is not associated with reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life.

Alirocumab has favourable effects on plaque composition

Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infraction. The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1771-81

PCSK inhibitors have been shown to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and improve clinical outcomes in patients with recent ACS. The PACMAN-AMI trial examined whether the addition of alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy affected coronary atherosclerotic plaques in the non-infracted related arteries. Following PCU of the culprit lesion in the infarct related artery (IRA), eligible patients underwent intracoronary imaging of the non-IRA with OCT, IVUS and NIRS, and then randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 150mg alirocumab (n=148) or placebo (n=152) biweekly via subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks.  Both groups also received rosuvastatin 20mg daily. Main inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, successful PCI of the culprit vessel (STEMI=53%, NSTEMI=47%), suitability for intracoronary imaging with angiographic stenosis between 20-50% in the proximal segments of two non-IRAs, and LDL-C at baseline ≥ 125 mg/dl if not on a statin for 4 weeks prior to presentation or ≥ 70mg/dl if on a stable dose of a statin. Key exclusion criteria were left main or three vessel disease, history of CABG, severe chronic kidney or liver disease, and known statin intolerance. The mean age was 58 years, 18% were female, 10% were diabetic, and mean LDL-C was 152.4 mg/dl. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of change in mean percent atheroma volume from baseline for alirocumab was greater than placebo -2.13% vs. -0.92% (p<0.001). Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was −79.42 with alirocumab vs. −37.60 with placebo (difference, −41.24; 95% CI: −70.71 to −11.77; p= 0.006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67μm with alirocumab vs. 33.19μm with placebo (difference, 29.65μm; 95% CI: 11.75-47.55; p=0.001). Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs. 72.8% of patients receiving placebo. The change in LDL-C from baseline was -131.2 mg/dl in the alirocumab group vs. -76.5 mg/dl in the placebo group (p<0.001).

 

Valvular Heart Disease

Embolic protection remains a challenge

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. NEJM 2022 Online

Embolization of biological material from either the aortic valve and/or the aorta may cause a periprocedural stroke in 2-2.5% of patients undergoing TAVI. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in capturing debris in 99% of patients but the reduction in new cerebral lesion volume was not significant. The PROTECTED TAVR trial was a prospective, postmarket, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Sentinal CEP in reducing stroke within 72 hours of transfemoral TAVI or before discharge. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of a focal or global neurologic dysfunction caused by vascular injury to the brain, spinal cord, or retina leading to haemorrhage or infarction. Disabling stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, delirium, major or minor vascular complications at the CEP access site, and acute kidney injury were also assessed.  Patients (n=3000) were eligible if they had AS and were scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVI using a commercially available device. Patients were excluded if they had left common carotid or brachiocephalic artery stenosis >70% or the anatomical structure was unfavourable for placement of the CEP device. The mean age was 78.9±7.8 years, mean STS score 3.4±2.7, 40% were female, history of CVA/TIA was present in 8%, 8% had bicuspid AS, 3% had valve-in-valve procedure, a balloon expandable device was used in 64%, and duration of follow-up was 72 hours. The primary outcome was similar in the CEP and control groups (2.3% vs. 2.9%; difference -0.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7 to 0.5; p=0.30). The rates of secondary outcomes for CEP and control groups were disabling stoke (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.05), all-cause mortality (0.5% vs. 0.3%), stroke/TIA/delirium (3.1% vs. 3.7%), and acute kidney injury (0.5% vs. 0.5%).

Potential additional mechanism for stroke in TAVI patients

Cerebral microbleeds during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging cohort.

Circ 2022; 146:383-397

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in elderly people and yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. The incidence of new CMBs and factors contributing to their formation in patients undergoing TAVI has not been previously examined. The current study prospectively examined a cohort of 84 patients with severe aortic stenosis that were referred for TAVI. Mean age was 80.9±5.7 years and 53% were female. On preprocedural MRI, 26% of the patients had at least 1 CMBs whilst following TAVI, new CMBs was observed in 23% of patients. In univariate analysis, a previous history of bleeding (p=0.01), higher total dose of heparin (p=0.02), a prolonged procedure (p=0.03), no protamine reversal (p=0.04), higher final ACT (p=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high molecular weight: multimer ratio (p=0.007) and lower final closure time with ADP (p=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. In multivariate analysis, a prolonged procedure for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time (p=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect for every lower 0.1 unit of high molecular weight: ratio (p=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. Of note, new CMBs were not associated with changes in neurological outcome or quality of life at 6 months follow-up.

UK TAVI provides additional support for TAVI in the lower risk surgical patients

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. A randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887

TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is being increasingly supported by data from randomized clinical trials. The UK TAVI trial examined whether TAVI was noninferior to SAVR in 913 patients (TAVI=458, SAVR=458) aged 70 years or older with severe symptomatic AS and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity. Key exclusion criteria were life expectancy < 1-year, previous AVR or TAVI, technically unsuitable for TAVI or SAVR, CAD for which surgical revascularization was required, primary aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation. Other salient features included mean LV ejection fraction=5.7%, transfemoral access=92%, conscious sedation during TAVI=70%, 45% received the Sapien 3 valve, 14% Evolut/Evolut R, and 10% Lotus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. There were 36 secondary outcomes including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding, vascular complications, requirement for a pacemaker, and aortic regurgitation. The median age was 81 years, 46% were female, median STS score was 2.6%, and 99.9% completed follow-up. At 1-year, mortality was 4.6% in the TAVI group and 6.6% in the surgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: −∞ to 1.2%; p < .001 for noninferiority). Of the 30 prespecified secondary outcomes, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with shorter hospital stay (median of 3 days vs. 8 days). TAVI was also associated with significantly lower bleeding complications (7.2% vs. 20.2%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs. 2.4%; HR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.54-7.71), pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs. 7.3%; HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), and mild (38.3% vs. 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs. 0.6%) aortic regurgitation. The rates of stroke were similar in the TAVI and SAVR groups (2.3% vs. 0.6%).

Expanding techniques for treating severe TR

6-Month outcomes of the TricValve sytem in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: the TRICUS EURO study.

JACC Cardiol Interv 2022; 15:1366-77

Bicaval valve implantation (CAVI) has emerged as a novel transcatheter strategy for indirectly treating the systemic manifestation of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients ineligible for cardiac surgery or edge-to-edge repair. The Tricvalve system consists of 2 self-expanding valves designed for the SVC and IVC premounted in a 27.5-F delivery system. Caval anchoring is based on stent design, radial force, and the degree of oversizing. The TRICUS EURO study was a nonblind, nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter, prospective trial of 35 patients with symptomatic severe TR (grade ≥3 in a 5-grade classification) despite optimal medical therapy and NYHA functional class III or IV. The main exclusion criteria included severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP≥65mmHg) and/or significant renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine >3mg/dl). The primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) improvement measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up. The mean age was 76 ± 6.8 years, 83% were female, 20% were diabetic, and the overall EuroSCORE II was 5.8 ± 4.2. At 30 days, procedural success was 94%, with no procedural death or conversion to surgery. At 6 months, patients had a significant improvement in QoL from 42.01 ± 22.3 to 59.7 ± 23.6 (p=0.004) correlating with a significant improvement in NYHA class with 79.4% of patients noted to be in class I or II (p=0.0006). The rates of 6-month all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 8.5% and 20% respectively. There were 6 cases of major bleeding and 2 were access site related. The study represents the first comprehensive short-term analysis of a dedicated CAVI system and longer-term data are required to assess clinical benefits and haemodynamic effects upon the pulmonary and right heart status.

 

Miscellaneous

Hydration remains key for renal protection

Study evaluating the use of RenalGuard to protect patients at high risk of AKI. JACC 2022; 15:1639-48

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may occur in 2-7% of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. A variety of measures including hydration with sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and hemofiltration have been examined in randomized trials but no measure except adequate intravenous (IV) hydration and minimal contrast use have been shown to be effective strategies. The RenalGuard system (RG) is a device that delivers real-time isotonic IV hydration matched with frusemide-induced diuresis allowing hydration and contrast clearance thus preventing fluid overload and volume depletion. The STRENGTH study examined the superiority of RG over standard practice (considering the ESC guidelines including IV and oral hydration, the dose of contrast medium and staged procedure if necessary) in 259 patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 15-40 ml/min/m2) requiring complex coronary, structural, or peripheral procedures with an expected contrast injection of at least 3x the estimated GFR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dl and/or an increase of 25% of basal value at around day 3 or the requirement for dialysis within 5 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included a change in serum creatinine value and GFR at 12 months, % of patients on temporary or chronic haemodialysis at 12 months, and MACCEs. In the whole population, the mean age was 79 years, 50% were male, baseline GFR was 32ml/min/1.73m2, 48% underwent PCI, 34% structural intervention (TAVI and LAA closure), and 18% peripheral intervention. The mean amount of contrast use was similar in both groups (116ml in the RG group vs. 104ml in the control group; p=0.26). The total fluid intake was higher in the RG group (6196ml vs. 1407ml; p<0.0001). The primary endpoint was similar in the RG and control groups (15.9% vs. 13.9%; difference=2.4; 95% CI:-7.1-12; p=0.62). At 12 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The rate of MACCEs were also similar at a median of 342 days (20.5% in RG group vs. 22.2% in the control group).

R&D Literature Review October 2021

R&D Literature Review October 2021

BCIS R&D Group Literature Review

September 2022

Prepared by Michael Mahmoudi, Paul Morris and Natalia Briceno
Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

Coronary Artery Disease

No need for routine non-invasive stress testing post-PCI

Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. NEJM 2022; 387:905-915

The optimal follow-up strategy for patients undergoing coronary revascularization who have high-risk characteristics is variable. Some studies have shown that functional testing is widely used in clinical practice with more than half of all such patients having had functional testing within 2 years of revascularization. The POST-PCI investigators conducted a randomized superiority trial to compare an active follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, Exercise electrocardiography) examined whether a follow-up strategy that includes functional testing improved clinical outcomes. Patients (n=1706) who had undergone successful PCI with DES, bioresorbable scaffolds, or drug-coated balloon (for ISR) who had at least one high-risk anatomical feature (left main disease, bifurcation disease, ostial disease, CTO, multivessel disease warranting PCI of at least two vessels, a restenotic lesion, lesion length > 30mm or a lesion warranting a stent length of > 32mm, and bypass graft disease) or clinical characteristics (diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine ≥ 177 mmol/l or long-term haemodialysis, and enzyme positive ACS) were enrolled to a strategy of routine functional testing (n=849) at 1 year post PCI or standard care alone (n=857). Patients underwent routine follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE defined as death from any cause, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. The mean age was 64.7±10.3, 79.5% were men, 21% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had a diffuse long lesion, 38.7% had diabetes, 19.4% had an ACS, 96.4% were treated with DES, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.0, the mean stent length was 57mm, FFR was measured in 35.7% of the patients, and intravascular imaging was used in 74.4%. At 2 years, the primary endpoint was similar in the functional testing and standard care groups (5.5% vs. 6.0%; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.35; p=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, invasive angiography had been undertaken in 12.3% of the functional testing group and 9.3% of the standard care group (p=0.62) had undergone invasive angiography. The rates of revascularization were also similar in the two groups (8.1% vs. 5.8%; p>0.05).

 

Reviving a failing heart with PCI

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic ventricular dysfunction.

NEJM 2022 Online

The benefits of coronary revascularization in patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains uncertain. A survival benefit in patients undergoing CABG in this population became apparent only after 10 years in the STICH trial. The REVIVED investigators examined whether coronary revascularization with PCI in addition to guideline directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n=347) as compared to OMT alone (n=353) improved event-free survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, extensive coronary artery disease (BCIS jeopardy score ≥ 6) and myocardial viability in at least four dysfunctional segments amenable to revascularization with PCI. The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The major secondary outcomes were LVEF at 6 and 12 months, KCCQ overall summary score, the score on the EQ-5D-5L score, and NYHA functional class. The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Median age was 70 years, 88% were men, 77% had NYHA class I/II, and 67% had no angina. The primary outcome occurred in 37.2% of the PCI plus OMT group and 38% of the OMT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.27; p=0.96). The rates of death (31.7% vs. 32.6%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.27) and hospitalization for heart failure (14.7% vs. 15.3%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43) were similar in the PCI plus OMT and OMT groups. The LVEF was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.7-0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference; 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7-3.4). Quality of life scores at 6 and 12 months favoured the PCI group but this difference diminished at 24 months. Of note, approximately 50% of the patients had 2V CAD and a median of two lesions and vessels were treated per patient which may be out of proportion to the extent of LV dysfunction. Other salient features include lack of description of the severity of stenoses, physiological assessment of the lesion, and lack of correlation of stenosis with previous ischemic/viability testing.

Secure compliance with the polypill

Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

NEJM 2022; 387:967-977

Noncompliance with guideline directed optimal medical therapy is a frequently observed challenge faced by patients and healthcare providers. This is often associated with adverse clinical outcomes particularly in patients at the highest risk of adverse clinical events. A polypill strategy has been shown to improve compliance and lower cardiovascular event rates in trials of primary prevention.  The SECURE trial was a randomized phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy of a polypill strategy, as compared with standard care, with respect to major cardiovascular outcomes (defined as CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) in patients older than 75 years of age or at least 65 years of age with at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, mild or moderate renal disease defined as creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2 of body surface area, previous MI, previous coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), or previous stroke. All patients had to have had a history of type 1 MI within the previous 6 months. The polypill contained any of three formulations Polypill AAR40-a single pill containing aspirin 100mg, ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10mg, and atorvastatin 40mg. The dose of the atorvastatin could be reduced to 20mg on clinical grounds in which case the Polypill AAR20 was used (same as AAR40 but reduced dose of atorvastatin at 20mg). In patients who were not on ramipril at baseline, treatment was commenced at 2.5mg; in those who were already on an ACE inhibitor, treatment was commenced at the equivalent dose of ramipril with the aim of reaching 10mg. Follow-up was undertaken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. At 6 and 24 months, adherence was checked using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. A total of 2499 patients were randomized (polypill=1258, standard care=1241). The median time between the index MI and randomization was 8 days. The mean age was 76±6.6 years, 31% were female, 77.9% had hypertension, 57.4% had diabetes, 51.3% had a history of smoking, mean systolic blood pressure was 129.1±17.7, and mean LDL was 89.2±37.2. Most patients in the polypill group (91.7%) received the 40mg formulation of atorvastatin as compared to 40.4% in the standard care group. 98.7% of patients in the standard care group received aspirin and 95.1% received an additional antiplatelet agent as compared to 94% in the polypill group. The primary endpoint was lower in the polypill group (9.5% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.76; 95% CI; 0.60-0.96; p=0.02). All components of the composite outcome except for urgent revascularization were reduced in a consistent manner. The secondary outcome of CV death, MI, or stroke was also lower in the polypill group (8.2% vs. 11.7%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90); p=0.005). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (9.3% vs. 9.5%; p=0.79). Adherence was higher in the polypill group both at 6 months (70.6% vs. 62.7%; RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.20) and 24 months (74.1% vs. 63.2%; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25).

Routine pressure wire assessment not supported by RIPCORD-2

Routine pressure wire assessment versus conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease: The RIPCORD 2 trial.

Circ 2022 Online

FFR-guided PCI has been shown to be associated lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography guidance alone. The value of FFR of all major coronary vessels at the time diagnostic angiography has not been established. The RIPCORD 2 trial was an 1100 patient prospective, multicentre, randomized trial that compared a strategy of coronary angiography alone versus coronary angiography + routine FFR assessment of all epicardial vessels of sufficient size amenable to revascularization to determine whether the latter strategy was associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome. In the angiography + FFR group, the median number of vessels examined was 4. There were no differences in the median hospital costs between the two groups (£4136 for angiography vs. £4510 for angiography + FFR; p=0.137) nor the median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (75 vs. 75; p=0.88). The number of clinical events were death (5 vs. 8), stroke (3 vs. 4), MI (23 vs. 22), and unplanned revascularization (26 vs. 33) with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% for angiography versus 9.5% for angiography + FFR (p=0.64). The study thus concluded that routine FFR at the stage of diagnostic angiography is not associated with reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life.

Alirocumab has favourable effects on plaque composition

Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infraction. The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1771-81

PCSK inhibitors have been shown to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and improve clinical outcomes in patients with recent ACS. The PACMAN-AMI trial examined whether the addition of alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy affected coronary atherosclerotic plaques in the non-infracted related arteries. Following PCU of the culprit lesion in the infarct related artery (IRA), eligible patients underwent intracoronary imaging of the non-IRA with OCT, IVUS and NIRS, and then randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 150mg alirocumab (n=148) or placebo (n=152) biweekly via subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks.  Both groups also received rosuvastatin 20mg daily. Main inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, successful PCI of the culprit vessel (STEMI=53%, NSTEMI=47%), suitability for intracoronary imaging with angiographic stenosis between 20-50% in the proximal segments of two non-IRAs, and LDL-C at baseline ≥ 125 mg/dl if not on a statin for 4 weeks prior to presentation or ≥ 70mg/dl if on a stable dose of a statin. Key exclusion criteria were left main or three vessel disease, history of CABG, severe chronic kidney or liver disease, and known statin intolerance. The mean age was 58 years, 18% were female, 10% were diabetic, and mean LDL-C was 152.4 mg/dl. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of change in mean percent atheroma volume from baseline for alirocumab was greater than placebo -2.13% vs. -0.92% (p<0.001). Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was −79.42 with alirocumab vs. −37.60 with placebo (difference, −41.24; 95% CI: −70.71 to −11.77; p= 0.006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67μm with alirocumab vs. 33.19μm with placebo (difference, 29.65μm; 95% CI: 11.75-47.55; p=0.001). Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs. 72.8% of patients receiving placebo. The change in LDL-C from baseline was -131.2 mg/dl in the alirocumab group vs. -76.5 mg/dl in the placebo group (p<0.001).

 

Valvular Heart Disease

Embolic protection remains a challenge

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. NEJM 2022 Online

Embolization of biological material from either the aortic valve and/or the aorta may cause a periprocedural stroke in 2-2.5% of patients undergoing TAVI. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in capturing debris in 99% of patients but the reduction in new cerebral lesion volume was not significant. The PROTECTED TAVR trial was a prospective, postmarket, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Sentinal CEP in reducing stroke within 72 hours of transfemoral TAVI or before discharge. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of a focal or global neurologic dysfunction caused by vascular injury to the brain, spinal cord, or retina leading to haemorrhage or infarction. Disabling stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, delirium, major or minor vascular complications at the CEP access site, and acute kidney injury were also assessed.  Patients (n=3000) were eligible if they had AS and were scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVI using a commercially available device. Patients were excluded if they had left common carotid or brachiocephalic artery stenosis >70% or the anatomical structure was unfavourable for placement of the CEP device. The mean age was 78.9±7.8 years, mean STS score 3.4±2.7, 40% were female, history of CVA/TIA was present in 8%, 8% had bicuspid AS, 3% had valve-in-valve procedure, a balloon expandable device was used in 64%, and duration of follow-up was 72 hours. The primary outcome was similar in the CEP and control groups (2.3% vs. 2.9%; difference -0.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7 to 0.5; p=0.30). The rates of secondary outcomes for CEP and control groups were disabling stoke (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.05), all-cause mortality (0.5% vs. 0.3%), stroke/TIA/delirium (3.1% vs. 3.7%), and acute kidney injury (0.5% vs. 0.5%).

Potential additional mechanism for stroke in TAVI patients

Cerebral microbleeds during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging cohort.

Circ 2022; 146:383-397

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in elderly people and yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. The incidence of new CMBs and factors contributing to their formation in patients undergoing TAVI has not been previously examined. The current study prospectively examined a cohort of 84 patients with severe aortic stenosis that were referred for TAVI. Mean age was 80.9±5.7 years and 53% were female. On preprocedural MRI, 26% of the patients had at least 1 CMBs whilst following TAVI, new CMBs was observed in 23% of patients. In univariate analysis, a previous history of bleeding (p=0.01), higher total dose of heparin (p=0.02), a prolonged procedure (p=0.03), no protamine reversal (p=0.04), higher final ACT (p=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high molecular weight: multimer ratio (p=0.007) and lower final closure time with ADP (p=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. In multivariate analysis, a prolonged procedure for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time (p=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect for every lower 0.1 unit of high molecular weight: ratio (p=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. Of note, new CMBs were not associated with changes in neurological outcome or quality of life at 6 months follow-up.

UK TAVI provides additional support for TAVI in the lower risk surgical patients

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. A randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887

TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is being increasingly supported by data from randomized clinical trials. The UK TAVI trial examined whether TAVI was noninferior to SAVR in 913 patients (TAVI=458, SAVR=458) aged 70 years or older with severe symptomatic AS and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity. Key exclusion criteria were life expectancy < 1-year, previous AVR or TAVI, technically unsuitable for TAVI or SAVR, CAD for which surgical revascularization was required, primary aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation. Other salient features included mean LV ejection fraction=5.7%, transfemoral access=92%, conscious sedation during TAVI=70%, 45% received the Sapien 3 valve, 14% Evolut/Evolut R, and 10% Lotus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. There were 36 secondary outcomes including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding, vascular complications, requirement for a pacemaker, and aortic regurgitation. The median age was 81 years, 46% were female, median STS score was 2.6%, and 99.9% completed follow-up. At 1-year, mortality was 4.6% in the TAVI group and 6.6% in the surgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: −∞ to 1.2%; p < .001 for noninferiority). Of the 30 prespecified secondary outcomes, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with shorter hospital stay (median of 3 days vs. 8 days). TAVI was also associated with significantly lower bleeding complications (7.2% vs. 20.2%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs. 2.4%; HR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.54-7.71), pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs. 7.3%; HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), and mild (38.3% vs. 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs. 0.6%) aortic regurgitation. The rates of stroke were similar in the TAVI and SAVR groups (2.3% vs. 0.6%).

Expanding techniques for treating severe TR

6-Month outcomes of the TricValve sytem in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: the TRICUS EURO study.

JACC Cardiol Interv 2022; 15:1366-77

Bicaval valve implantation (CAVI) has emerged as a novel transcatheter strategy for indirectly treating the systemic manifestation of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients ineligible for cardiac surgery or edge-to-edge repair. The Tricvalve system consists of 2 self-expanding valves designed for the SVC and IVC premounted in a 27.5-F delivery system. Caval anchoring is based on stent design, radial force, and the degree of oversizing. The TRICUS EURO study was a nonblind, nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter, prospective trial of 35 patients with symptomatic severe TR (grade ≥3 in a 5-grade classification) despite optimal medical therapy and NYHA functional class III or IV. The main exclusion criteria included severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP≥65mmHg) and/or significant renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine >3mg/dl). The primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) improvement measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up. The mean age was 76 ± 6.8 years, 83% were female, 20% were diabetic, and the overall EuroSCORE II was 5.8 ± 4.2. At 30 days, procedural success was 94%, with no procedural death or conversion to surgery. At 6 months, patients had a significant improvement in QoL from 42.01 ± 22.3 to 59.7 ± 23.6 (p=0.004) correlating with a significant improvement in NYHA class with 79.4% of patients noted to be in class I or II (p=0.0006). The rates of 6-month all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 8.5% and 20% respectively. There were 6 cases of major bleeding and 2 were access site related. The study represents the first comprehensive short-term analysis of a dedicated CAVI system and longer-term data are required to assess clinical benefits and haemodynamic effects upon the pulmonary and right heart status.

 

Miscellaneous

Hydration remains key for renal protection

Study evaluating the use of RenalGuard to protect patients at high risk of AKI. JACC 2022; 15:1639-48

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may occur in 2-7% of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. A variety of measures including hydration with sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and hemofiltration have been examined in randomized trials but no measure except adequate intravenous (IV) hydration and minimal contrast use have been shown to be effective strategies. The RenalGuard system (RG) is a device that delivers real-time isotonic IV hydration matched with frusemide-induced diuresis allowing hydration and contrast clearance thus preventing fluid overload and volume depletion. The STRENGTH study examined the superiority of RG over standard practice (considering the ESC guidelines including IV and oral hydration, the dose of contrast medium and staged procedure if necessary) in 259 patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 15-40 ml/min/m2) requiring complex coronary, structural, or peripheral procedures with an expected contrast injection of at least 3x the estimated GFR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dl and/or an increase of 25% of basal value at around day 3 or the requirement for dialysis within 5 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included a change in serum creatinine value and GFR at 12 months, % of patients on temporary or chronic haemodialysis at 12 months, and MACCEs. In the whole population, the mean age was 79 years, 50% were male, baseline GFR was 32ml/min/1.73m2, 48% underwent PCI, 34% structural intervention (TAVI and LAA closure), and 18% peripheral intervention. The mean amount of contrast use was similar in both groups (116ml in the RG group vs. 104ml in the control group; p=0.26). The total fluid intake was higher in the RG group (6196ml vs. 1407ml; p<0.0001). The primary endpoint was similar in the RG and control groups (15.9% vs. 13.9%; difference=2.4; 95% CI:-7.1-12; p=0.62). At 12 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The rate of MACCEs were also similar at a median of 342 days (20.5% in RG group vs. 22.2% in the control group).

R&D Literature Review June 2021

R&D Literature Review June 2021

BCIS R&D Group Literature Review

September 2022

Prepared by Michael Mahmoudi, Paul Morris and Natalia Briceno
Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

Coronary Artery Disease

No need for routine non-invasive stress testing post-PCI

Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. NEJM 2022; 387:905-915

The optimal follow-up strategy for patients undergoing coronary revascularization who have high-risk characteristics is variable. Some studies have shown that functional testing is widely used in clinical practice with more than half of all such patients having had functional testing within 2 years of revascularization. The POST-PCI investigators conducted a randomized superiority trial to compare an active follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, Exercise electrocardiography) examined whether a follow-up strategy that includes functional testing improved clinical outcomes. Patients (n=1706) who had undergone successful PCI with DES, bioresorbable scaffolds, or drug-coated balloon (for ISR) who had at least one high-risk anatomical feature (left main disease, bifurcation disease, ostial disease, CTO, multivessel disease warranting PCI of at least two vessels, a restenotic lesion, lesion length > 30mm or a lesion warranting a stent length of > 32mm, and bypass graft disease) or clinical characteristics (diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine ≥ 177 mmol/l or long-term haemodialysis, and enzyme positive ACS) were enrolled to a strategy of routine functional testing (n=849) at 1 year post PCI or standard care alone (n=857). Patients underwent routine follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE defined as death from any cause, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. The mean age was 64.7±10.3, 79.5% were men, 21% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had a diffuse long lesion, 38.7% had diabetes, 19.4% had an ACS, 96.4% were treated with DES, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.0, the mean stent length was 57mm, FFR was measured in 35.7% of the patients, and intravascular imaging was used in 74.4%. At 2 years, the primary endpoint was similar in the functional testing and standard care groups (5.5% vs. 6.0%; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.35; p=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, invasive angiography had been undertaken in 12.3% of the functional testing group and 9.3% of the standard care group (p=0.62) had undergone invasive angiography. The rates of revascularization were also similar in the two groups (8.1% vs. 5.8%; p>0.05).

 

Reviving a failing heart with PCI

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic ventricular dysfunction.

NEJM 2022 Online

The benefits of coronary revascularization in patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains uncertain. A survival benefit in patients undergoing CABG in this population became apparent only after 10 years in the STICH trial. The REVIVED investigators examined whether coronary revascularization with PCI in addition to guideline directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n=347) as compared to OMT alone (n=353) improved event-free survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, extensive coronary artery disease (BCIS jeopardy score ≥ 6) and myocardial viability in at least four dysfunctional segments amenable to revascularization with PCI. The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The major secondary outcomes were LVEF at 6 and 12 months, KCCQ overall summary score, the score on the EQ-5D-5L score, and NYHA functional class. The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Median age was 70 years, 88% were men, 77% had NYHA class I/II, and 67% had no angina. The primary outcome occurred in 37.2% of the PCI plus OMT group and 38% of the OMT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.27; p=0.96). The rates of death (31.7% vs. 32.6%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.27) and hospitalization for heart failure (14.7% vs. 15.3%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43) were similar in the PCI plus OMT and OMT groups. The LVEF was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.7-0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference; 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7-3.4). Quality of life scores at 6 and 12 months favoured the PCI group but this difference diminished at 24 months. Of note, approximately 50% of the patients had 2V CAD and a median of two lesions and vessels were treated per patient which may be out of proportion to the extent of LV dysfunction. Other salient features include lack of description of the severity of stenoses, physiological assessment of the lesion, and lack of correlation of stenosis with previous ischemic/viability testing.

Secure compliance with the polypill

Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

NEJM 2022; 387:967-977

Noncompliance with guideline directed optimal medical therapy is a frequently observed challenge faced by patients and healthcare providers. This is often associated with adverse clinical outcomes particularly in patients at the highest risk of adverse clinical events. A polypill strategy has been shown to improve compliance and lower cardiovascular event rates in trials of primary prevention.  The SECURE trial was a randomized phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy of a polypill strategy, as compared with standard care, with respect to major cardiovascular outcomes (defined as CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) in patients older than 75 years of age or at least 65 years of age with at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, mild or moderate renal disease defined as creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2 of body surface area, previous MI, previous coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), or previous stroke. All patients had to have had a history of type 1 MI within the previous 6 months. The polypill contained any of three formulations Polypill AAR40-a single pill containing aspirin 100mg, ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10mg, and atorvastatin 40mg. The dose of the atorvastatin could be reduced to 20mg on clinical grounds in which case the Polypill AAR20 was used (same as AAR40 but reduced dose of atorvastatin at 20mg). In patients who were not on ramipril at baseline, treatment was commenced at 2.5mg; in those who were already on an ACE inhibitor, treatment was commenced at the equivalent dose of ramipril with the aim of reaching 10mg. Follow-up was undertaken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. At 6 and 24 months, adherence was checked using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. A total of 2499 patients were randomized (polypill=1258, standard care=1241). The median time between the index MI and randomization was 8 days. The mean age was 76±6.6 years, 31% were female, 77.9% had hypertension, 57.4% had diabetes, 51.3% had a history of smoking, mean systolic blood pressure was 129.1±17.7, and mean LDL was 89.2±37.2. Most patients in the polypill group (91.7%) received the 40mg formulation of atorvastatin as compared to 40.4% in the standard care group. 98.7% of patients in the standard care group received aspirin and 95.1% received an additional antiplatelet agent as compared to 94% in the polypill group. The primary endpoint was lower in the polypill group (9.5% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.76; 95% CI; 0.60-0.96; p=0.02). All components of the composite outcome except for urgent revascularization were reduced in a consistent manner. The secondary outcome of CV death, MI, or stroke was also lower in the polypill group (8.2% vs. 11.7%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90); p=0.005). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (9.3% vs. 9.5%; p=0.79). Adherence was higher in the polypill group both at 6 months (70.6% vs. 62.7%; RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.20) and 24 months (74.1% vs. 63.2%; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25).

Routine pressure wire assessment not supported by RIPCORD-2

Routine pressure wire assessment versus conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease: The RIPCORD 2 trial.

Circ 2022 Online

FFR-guided PCI has been shown to be associated lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography guidance alone. The value of FFR of all major coronary vessels at the time diagnostic angiography has not been established. The RIPCORD 2 trial was an 1100 patient prospective, multicentre, randomized trial that compared a strategy of coronary angiography alone versus coronary angiography + routine FFR assessment of all epicardial vessels of sufficient size amenable to revascularization to determine whether the latter strategy was associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome. In the angiography + FFR group, the median number of vessels examined was 4. There were no differences in the median hospital costs between the two groups (£4136 for angiography vs. £4510 for angiography + FFR; p=0.137) nor the median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (75 vs. 75; p=0.88). The number of clinical events were death (5 vs. 8), stroke (3 vs. 4), MI (23 vs. 22), and unplanned revascularization (26 vs. 33) with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% for angiography versus 9.5% for angiography + FFR (p=0.64). The study thus concluded that routine FFR at the stage of diagnostic angiography is not associated with reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life.

Alirocumab has favourable effects on plaque composition

Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infraction. The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1771-81

PCSK inhibitors have been shown to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and improve clinical outcomes in patients with recent ACS. The PACMAN-AMI trial examined whether the addition of alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy affected coronary atherosclerotic plaques in the non-infracted related arteries. Following PCU of the culprit lesion in the infarct related artery (IRA), eligible patients underwent intracoronary imaging of the non-IRA with OCT, IVUS and NIRS, and then randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 150mg alirocumab (n=148) or placebo (n=152) biweekly via subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks.  Both groups also received rosuvastatin 20mg daily. Main inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, successful PCI of the culprit vessel (STEMI=53%, NSTEMI=47%), suitability for intracoronary imaging with angiographic stenosis between 20-50% in the proximal segments of two non-IRAs, and LDL-C at baseline ≥ 125 mg/dl if not on a statin for 4 weeks prior to presentation or ≥ 70mg/dl if on a stable dose of a statin. Key exclusion criteria were left main or three vessel disease, history of CABG, severe chronic kidney or liver disease, and known statin intolerance. The mean age was 58 years, 18% were female, 10% were diabetic, and mean LDL-C was 152.4 mg/dl. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of change in mean percent atheroma volume from baseline for alirocumab was greater than placebo -2.13% vs. -0.92% (p<0.001). Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was −79.42 with alirocumab vs. −37.60 with placebo (difference, −41.24; 95% CI: −70.71 to −11.77; p= 0.006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67μm with alirocumab vs. 33.19μm with placebo (difference, 29.65μm; 95% CI: 11.75-47.55; p=0.001). Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs. 72.8% of patients receiving placebo. The change in LDL-C from baseline was -131.2 mg/dl in the alirocumab group vs. -76.5 mg/dl in the placebo group (p<0.001).

 

Valvular Heart Disease

Embolic protection remains a challenge

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. NEJM 2022 Online

Embolization of biological material from either the aortic valve and/or the aorta may cause a periprocedural stroke in 2-2.5% of patients undergoing TAVI. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in capturing debris in 99% of patients but the reduction in new cerebral lesion volume was not significant. The PROTECTED TAVR trial was a prospective, postmarket, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Sentinal CEP in reducing stroke within 72 hours of transfemoral TAVI or before discharge. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of a focal or global neurologic dysfunction caused by vascular injury to the brain, spinal cord, or retina leading to haemorrhage or infarction. Disabling stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, delirium, major or minor vascular complications at the CEP access site, and acute kidney injury were also assessed.  Patients (n=3000) were eligible if they had AS and were scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVI using a commercially available device. Patients were excluded if they had left common carotid or brachiocephalic artery stenosis >70% or the anatomical structure was unfavourable for placement of the CEP device. The mean age was 78.9±7.8 years, mean STS score 3.4±2.7, 40% were female, history of CVA/TIA was present in 8%, 8% had bicuspid AS, 3% had valve-in-valve procedure, a balloon expandable device was used in 64%, and duration of follow-up was 72 hours. The primary outcome was similar in the CEP and control groups (2.3% vs. 2.9%; difference -0.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7 to 0.5; p=0.30). The rates of secondary outcomes for CEP and control groups were disabling stoke (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.05), all-cause mortality (0.5% vs. 0.3%), stroke/TIA/delirium (3.1% vs. 3.7%), and acute kidney injury (0.5% vs. 0.5%).

Potential additional mechanism for stroke in TAVI patients

Cerebral microbleeds during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging cohort.

Circ 2022; 146:383-397

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in elderly people and yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. The incidence of new CMBs and factors contributing to their formation in patients undergoing TAVI has not been previously examined. The current study prospectively examined a cohort of 84 patients with severe aortic stenosis that were referred for TAVI. Mean age was 80.9±5.7 years and 53% were female. On preprocedural MRI, 26% of the patients had at least 1 CMBs whilst following TAVI, new CMBs was observed in 23% of patients. In univariate analysis, a previous history of bleeding (p=0.01), higher total dose of heparin (p=0.02), a prolonged procedure (p=0.03), no protamine reversal (p=0.04), higher final ACT (p=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high molecular weight: multimer ratio (p=0.007) and lower final closure time with ADP (p=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. In multivariate analysis, a prolonged procedure for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time (p=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect for every lower 0.1 unit of high molecular weight: ratio (p=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. Of note, new CMBs were not associated with changes in neurological outcome or quality of life at 6 months follow-up.

UK TAVI provides additional support for TAVI in the lower risk surgical patients

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. A randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887

TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is being increasingly supported by data from randomized clinical trials. The UK TAVI trial examined whether TAVI was noninferior to SAVR in 913 patients (TAVI=458, SAVR=458) aged 70 years or older with severe symptomatic AS and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity. Key exclusion criteria were life expectancy < 1-year, previous AVR or TAVI, technically unsuitable for TAVI or SAVR, CAD for which surgical revascularization was required, primary aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation. Other salient features included mean LV ejection fraction=5.7%, transfemoral access=92%, conscious sedation during TAVI=70%, 45% received the Sapien 3 valve, 14% Evolut/Evolut R, and 10% Lotus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. There were 36 secondary outcomes including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding, vascular complications, requirement for a pacemaker, and aortic regurgitation. The median age was 81 years, 46% were female, median STS score was 2.6%, and 99.9% completed follow-up. At 1-year, mortality was 4.6% in the TAVI group and 6.6% in the surgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: −∞ to 1.2%; p < .001 for noninferiority). Of the 30 prespecified secondary outcomes, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with shorter hospital stay (median of 3 days vs. 8 days). TAVI was also associated with significantly lower bleeding complications (7.2% vs. 20.2%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs. 2.4%; HR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.54-7.71), pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs. 7.3%; HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), and mild (38.3% vs. 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs. 0.6%) aortic regurgitation. The rates of stroke were similar in the TAVI and SAVR groups (2.3% vs. 0.6%).

Expanding techniques for treating severe TR

6-Month outcomes of the TricValve sytem in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: the TRICUS EURO study.

JACC Cardiol Interv 2022; 15:1366-77

Bicaval valve implantation (CAVI) has emerged as a novel transcatheter strategy for indirectly treating the systemic manifestation of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients ineligible for cardiac surgery or edge-to-edge repair. The Tricvalve system consists of 2 self-expanding valves designed for the SVC and IVC premounted in a 27.5-F delivery system. Caval anchoring is based on stent design, radial force, and the degree of oversizing. The TRICUS EURO study was a nonblind, nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter, prospective trial of 35 patients with symptomatic severe TR (grade ≥3 in a 5-grade classification) despite optimal medical therapy and NYHA functional class III or IV. The main exclusion criteria included severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP≥65mmHg) and/or significant renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine >3mg/dl). The primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) improvement measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up. The mean age was 76 ± 6.8 years, 83% were female, 20% were diabetic, and the overall EuroSCORE II was 5.8 ± 4.2. At 30 days, procedural success was 94%, with no procedural death or conversion to surgery. At 6 months, patients had a significant improvement in QoL from 42.01 ± 22.3 to 59.7 ± 23.6 (p=0.004) correlating with a significant improvement in NYHA class with 79.4% of patients noted to be in class I or II (p=0.0006). The rates of 6-month all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 8.5% and 20% respectively. There were 6 cases of major bleeding and 2 were access site related. The study represents the first comprehensive short-term analysis of a dedicated CAVI system and longer-term data are required to assess clinical benefits and haemodynamic effects upon the pulmonary and right heart status.

 

Miscellaneous

Hydration remains key for renal protection

Study evaluating the use of RenalGuard to protect patients at high risk of AKI. JACC 2022; 15:1639-48

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may occur in 2-7% of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. A variety of measures including hydration with sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and hemofiltration have been examined in randomized trials but no measure except adequate intravenous (IV) hydration and minimal contrast use have been shown to be effective strategies. The RenalGuard system (RG) is a device that delivers real-time isotonic IV hydration matched with frusemide-induced diuresis allowing hydration and contrast clearance thus preventing fluid overload and volume depletion. The STRENGTH study examined the superiority of RG over standard practice (considering the ESC guidelines including IV and oral hydration, the dose of contrast medium and staged procedure if necessary) in 259 patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 15-40 ml/min/m2) requiring complex coronary, structural, or peripheral procedures with an expected contrast injection of at least 3x the estimated GFR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dl and/or an increase of 25% of basal value at around day 3 or the requirement for dialysis within 5 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included a change in serum creatinine value and GFR at 12 months, % of patients on temporary or chronic haemodialysis at 12 months, and MACCEs. In the whole population, the mean age was 79 years, 50% were male, baseline GFR was 32ml/min/1.73m2, 48% underwent PCI, 34% structural intervention (TAVI and LAA closure), and 18% peripheral intervention. The mean amount of contrast use was similar in both groups (116ml in the RG group vs. 104ml in the control group; p=0.26). The total fluid intake was higher in the RG group (6196ml vs. 1407ml; p<0.0001). The primary endpoint was similar in the RG and control groups (15.9% vs. 13.9%; difference=2.4; 95% CI:-7.1-12; p=0.62). At 12 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The rate of MACCEs were also similar at a median of 342 days (20.5% in RG group vs. 22.2% in the control group).

R&D Literature Review February 2021

R&D Literature Review February 2021

BCIS R&D Group Literature Review

September 2022

Prepared by Michael Mahmoudi, Paul Morris and Natalia Briceno
Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

Coronary Artery Disease

No need for routine non-invasive stress testing post-PCI

Routine functional testing or standard care in high-risk patients after PCI. NEJM 2022; 387:905-915

The optimal follow-up strategy for patients undergoing coronary revascularization who have high-risk characteristics is variable. Some studies have shown that functional testing is widely used in clinical practice with more than half of all such patients having had functional testing within 2 years of revascularization. The POST-PCI investigators conducted a randomized superiority trial to compare an active follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, Exercise electrocardiography) examined whether a follow-up strategy that includes functional testing improved clinical outcomes. Patients (n=1706) who had undergone successful PCI with DES, bioresorbable scaffolds, or drug-coated balloon (for ISR) who had at least one high-risk anatomical feature (left main disease, bifurcation disease, ostial disease, CTO, multivessel disease warranting PCI of at least two vessels, a restenotic lesion, lesion length > 30mm or a lesion warranting a stent length of > 32mm, and bypass graft disease) or clinical characteristics (diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine ≥ 177 mmol/l or long-term haemodialysis, and enzyme positive ACS) were enrolled to a strategy of routine functional testing (n=849) at 1 year post PCI or standard care alone (n=857). Patients underwent routine follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE defined as death from any cause, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. The mean age was 64.7±10.3, 79.5% were men, 21% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had a diffuse long lesion, 38.7% had diabetes, 19.4% had an ACS, 96.4% were treated with DES, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.0, the mean stent length was 57mm, FFR was measured in 35.7% of the patients, and intravascular imaging was used in 74.4%. At 2 years, the primary endpoint was similar in the functional testing and standard care groups (5.5% vs. 6.0%; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.61-1.35; p=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, invasive angiography had been undertaken in 12.3% of the functional testing group and 9.3% of the standard care group (p=0.62) had undergone invasive angiography. The rates of revascularization were also similar in the two groups (8.1% vs. 5.8%; p>0.05).

 

Reviving a failing heart with PCI

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic ventricular dysfunction.

NEJM 2022 Online

The benefits of coronary revascularization in patients with significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction remains uncertain. A survival benefit in patients undergoing CABG in this population became apparent only after 10 years in the STICH trial. The REVIVED investigators examined whether coronary revascularization with PCI in addition to guideline directed optimal medical therapy (OMT) (n=347) as compared to OMT alone (n=353) improved event-free survival in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, extensive coronary artery disease (BCIS jeopardy score ≥ 6) and myocardial viability in at least four dysfunctional segments amenable to revascularization with PCI. The primary composite outcome was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure over a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The major secondary outcomes were LVEF at 6 and 12 months, KCCQ overall summary score, the score on the EQ-5D-5L score, and NYHA functional class. The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Median age was 70 years, 88% were men, 77% had NYHA class I/II, and 67% had no angina. The primary outcome occurred in 37.2% of the PCI plus OMT group and 38% of the OMT group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.27; p=0.96). The rates of death (31.7% vs. 32.6%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.75-1.27) and hospitalization for heart failure (14.7% vs. 15.3%; HR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.66-1.43) were similar in the PCI plus OMT and OMT groups. The LVEF was similar in the two groups at 6 months (mean difference, -1.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.7-0.5) and at 12 months (mean difference; 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7-3.4). Quality of life scores at 6 and 12 months favoured the PCI group but this difference diminished at 24 months. Of note, approximately 50% of the patients had 2V CAD and a median of two lesions and vessels were treated per patient which may be out of proportion to the extent of LV dysfunction. Other salient features include lack of description of the severity of stenoses, physiological assessment of the lesion, and lack of correlation of stenosis with previous ischemic/viability testing.

Secure compliance with the polypill

Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

NEJM 2022; 387:967-977

Noncompliance with guideline directed optimal medical therapy is a frequently observed challenge faced by patients and healthcare providers. This is often associated with adverse clinical outcomes particularly in patients at the highest risk of adverse clinical events. A polypill strategy has been shown to improve compliance and lower cardiovascular event rates in trials of primary prevention.  The SECURE trial was a randomized phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy of a polypill strategy, as compared with standard care, with respect to major cardiovascular outcomes (defined as CV death, nonfatal type 1 MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization) in patients older than 75 years of age or at least 65 years of age with at least one of the following risk factors: diabetes mellitus, mild or moderate renal disease defined as creatinine clearance 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2 of body surface area, previous MI, previous coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG), or previous stroke. All patients had to have had a history of type 1 MI within the previous 6 months. The polypill contained any of three formulations Polypill AAR40-a single pill containing aspirin 100mg, ramipril 2.5, 5, or 10mg, and atorvastatin 40mg. The dose of the atorvastatin could be reduced to 20mg on clinical grounds in which case the Polypill AAR20 was used (same as AAR40 but reduced dose of atorvastatin at 20mg). In patients who were not on ramipril at baseline, treatment was commenced at 2.5mg; in those who were already on an ACE inhibitor, treatment was commenced at the equivalent dose of ramipril with the aim of reaching 10mg. Follow-up was undertaken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months. At 6 and 24 months, adherence was checked using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. A total of 2499 patients were randomized (polypill=1258, standard care=1241). The median time between the index MI and randomization was 8 days. The mean age was 76±6.6 years, 31% were female, 77.9% had hypertension, 57.4% had diabetes, 51.3% had a history of smoking, mean systolic blood pressure was 129.1±17.7, and mean LDL was 89.2±37.2. Most patients in the polypill group (91.7%) received the 40mg formulation of atorvastatin as compared to 40.4% in the standard care group. 98.7% of patients in the standard care group received aspirin and 95.1% received an additional antiplatelet agent as compared to 94% in the polypill group. The primary endpoint was lower in the polypill group (9.5% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.76; 95% CI; 0.60-0.96; p=0.02). All components of the composite outcome except for urgent revascularization were reduced in a consistent manner. The secondary outcome of CV death, MI, or stroke was also lower in the polypill group (8.2% vs. 11.7%; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90); p=0.005). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (9.3% vs. 9.5%; p=0.79). Adherence was higher in the polypill group both at 6 months (70.6% vs. 62.7%; RR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.20) and 24 months (74.1% vs. 63.2%; RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.10-1.25).

Routine pressure wire assessment not supported by RIPCORD-2

Routine pressure wire assessment versus conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease: The RIPCORD 2 trial.

Circ 2022 Online

FFR-guided PCI has been shown to be associated lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography guidance alone. The value of FFR of all major coronary vessels at the time diagnostic angiography has not been established. The RIPCORD 2 trial was an 1100 patient prospective, multicentre, randomized trial that compared a strategy of coronary angiography alone versus coronary angiography + routine FFR assessment of all epicardial vessels of sufficient size amenable to revascularization to determine whether the latter strategy was associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome. In the angiography + FFR group, the median number of vessels examined was 4. There were no differences in the median hospital costs between the two groups (£4136 for angiography vs. £4510 for angiography + FFR; p=0.137) nor the median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L (75 vs. 75; p=0.88). The number of clinical events were death (5 vs. 8), stroke (3 vs. 4), MI (23 vs. 22), and unplanned revascularization (26 vs. 33) with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% for angiography versus 9.5% for angiography + FFR (p=0.64). The study thus concluded that routine FFR at the stage of diagnostic angiography is not associated with reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life.

Alirocumab has favourable effects on plaque composition

Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infraction. The PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1771-81

PCSK inhibitors have been shown to result in significant reductions in LDL-C and improve clinical outcomes in patients with recent ACS. The PACMAN-AMI trial examined whether the addition of alirocumab to high-intensity statin therapy affected coronary atherosclerotic plaques in the non-infracted related arteries. Following PCU of the culprit lesion in the infarct related artery (IRA), eligible patients underwent intracoronary imaging of the non-IRA with OCT, IVUS and NIRS, and then randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either 150mg alirocumab (n=148) or placebo (n=152) biweekly via subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks.  Both groups also received rosuvastatin 20mg daily. Main inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, successful PCI of the culprit vessel (STEMI=53%, NSTEMI=47%), suitability for intracoronary imaging with angiographic stenosis between 20-50% in the proximal segments of two non-IRAs, and LDL-C at baseline ≥ 125 mg/dl if not on a statin for 4 weeks prior to presentation or ≥ 70mg/dl if on a stable dose of a statin. Key exclusion criteria were left main or three vessel disease, history of CABG, severe chronic kidney or liver disease, and known statin intolerance. The mean age was 58 years, 18% were female, 10% were diabetic, and mean LDL-C was 152.4 mg/dl. At 12 months, the primary endpoint of change in mean percent atheroma volume from baseline for alirocumab was greater than placebo -2.13% vs. -0.92% (p<0.001). Mean change in maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm was −79.42 with alirocumab vs. −37.60 with placebo (difference, −41.24; 95% CI: −70.71 to −11.77; p= 0.006). Mean change in minimal fibrous cap thickness was 62.67μm with alirocumab vs. 33.19μm with placebo (difference, 29.65μm; 95% CI: 11.75-47.55; p=0.001). Adverse events occurred in 70.7% of patients treated with alirocumab vs. 72.8% of patients receiving placebo. The change in LDL-C from baseline was -131.2 mg/dl in the alirocumab group vs. -76.5 mg/dl in the placebo group (p<0.001).

 

Valvular Heart Disease

Embolic protection remains a challenge

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. NEJM 2022 Online

Embolization of biological material from either the aortic valve and/or the aorta may cause a periprocedural stroke in 2-2.5% of patients undergoing TAVI. The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device (CEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in capturing debris in 99% of patients but the reduction in new cerebral lesion volume was not significant. The PROTECTED TAVR trial was a prospective, postmarket, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Sentinal CEP in reducing stroke within 72 hours of transfemoral TAVI or before discharge. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of a focal or global neurologic dysfunction caused by vascular injury to the brain, spinal cord, or retina leading to haemorrhage or infarction. Disabling stroke, death, transient ischemic attack, delirium, major or minor vascular complications at the CEP access site, and acute kidney injury were also assessed.  Patients (n=3000) were eligible if they had AS and were scheduled to undergo transfemoral TAVI using a commercially available device. Patients were excluded if they had left common carotid or brachiocephalic artery stenosis >70% or the anatomical structure was unfavourable for placement of the CEP device. The mean age was 78.9±7.8 years, mean STS score 3.4±2.7, 40% were female, history of CVA/TIA was present in 8%, 8% had bicuspid AS, 3% had valve-in-valve procedure, a balloon expandable device was used in 64%, and duration of follow-up was 72 hours. The primary outcome was similar in the CEP and control groups (2.3% vs. 2.9%; difference -0.6 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.7 to 0.5; p=0.30). The rates of secondary outcomes for CEP and control groups were disabling stoke (0.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.05), all-cause mortality (0.5% vs. 0.3%), stroke/TIA/delirium (3.1% vs. 3.7%), and acute kidney injury (0.5% vs. 0.5%).

Potential additional mechanism for stroke in TAVI patients

Cerebral microbleeds during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging cohort.

Circ 2022; 146:383-397

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are frequently observed in elderly people and yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. The incidence of new CMBs and factors contributing to their formation in patients undergoing TAVI has not been previously examined. The current study prospectively examined a cohort of 84 patients with severe aortic stenosis that were referred for TAVI. Mean age was 80.9±5.7 years and 53% were female. On preprocedural MRI, 26% of the patients had at least 1 CMBs whilst following TAVI, new CMBs was observed in 23% of patients. In univariate analysis, a previous history of bleeding (p=0.01), higher total dose of heparin (p=0.02), a prolonged procedure (p=0.03), no protamine reversal (p=0.04), higher final ACT (p=0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high molecular weight: multimer ratio (p=0.007) and lower final closure time with ADP (p=0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. In multivariate analysis, a prolonged procedure for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time (p=0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect for every lower 0.1 unit of high molecular weight: ratio (p=0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural CMBs. Of note, new CMBs were not associated with changes in neurological outcome or quality of life at 6 months follow-up.

UK TAVI provides additional support for TAVI in the lower risk surgical patients

Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. A randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887

TAVI in intermediate and low-risk patients is being increasingly supported by data from randomized clinical trials. The UK TAVI trial examined whether TAVI was noninferior to SAVR in 913 patients (TAVI=458, SAVR=458) aged 70 years or older with severe symptomatic AS and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity. Key exclusion criteria were life expectancy < 1-year, previous AVR or TAVI, technically unsuitable for TAVI or SAVR, CAD for which surgical revascularization was required, primary aortic regurgitation, and severe mitral regurgitation. Other salient features included mean LV ejection fraction=5.7%, transfemoral access=92%, conscious sedation during TAVI=70%, 45% received the Sapien 3 valve, 14% Evolut/Evolut R, and 10% Lotus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. There were 36 secondary outcomes including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding, vascular complications, requirement for a pacemaker, and aortic regurgitation. The median age was 81 years, 46% were female, median STS score was 2.6%, and 99.9% completed follow-up. At 1-year, mortality was 4.6% in the TAVI group and 6.6% in the surgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0%; 1-sided 97.5% CI: −∞ to 1.2%; p < .001 for noninferiority). Of the 30 prespecified secondary outcomes, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with shorter hospital stay (median of 3 days vs. 8 days). TAVI was also associated with significantly lower bleeding complications (7.2% vs. 20.2%; HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24-0.45) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs. 2.4%; HR: 4.42; 95% CI: 2.54-7.71), pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs. 7.3%; HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), and mild (38.3% vs. 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs. 0.6%) aortic regurgitation. The rates of stroke were similar in the TAVI and SAVR groups (2.3% vs. 0.6%).

Expanding techniques for treating severe TR

6-Month outcomes of the TricValve sytem in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: the TRICUS EURO study.

JACC Cardiol Interv 2022; 15:1366-77

Bicaval valve implantation (CAVI) has emerged as a novel transcatheter strategy for indirectly treating the systemic manifestation of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients ineligible for cardiac surgery or edge-to-edge repair. The Tricvalve system consists of 2 self-expanding valves designed for the SVC and IVC premounted in a 27.5-F delivery system. Caval anchoring is based on stent design, radial force, and the degree of oversizing. The TRICUS EURO study was a nonblind, nonrandomized, single arm, multicenter, prospective trial of 35 patients with symptomatic severe TR (grade ≥3 in a 5-grade classification) despite optimal medical therapy and NYHA functional class III or IV. The main exclusion criteria included severe right ventricular dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP≥65mmHg) and/or significant renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine >3mg/dl). The primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) improvement measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up. The mean age was 76 ± 6.8 years, 83% were female, 20% were diabetic, and the overall EuroSCORE II was 5.8 ± 4.2. At 30 days, procedural success was 94%, with no procedural death or conversion to surgery. At 6 months, patients had a significant improvement in QoL from 42.01 ± 22.3 to 59.7 ± 23.6 (p=0.004) correlating with a significant improvement in NYHA class with 79.4% of patients noted to be in class I or II (p=0.0006). The rates of 6-month all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 8.5% and 20% respectively. There were 6 cases of major bleeding and 2 were access site related. The study represents the first comprehensive short-term analysis of a dedicated CAVI system and longer-term data are required to assess clinical benefits and haemodynamic effects upon the pulmonary and right heart status.

 

Miscellaneous

Hydration remains key for renal protection

Study evaluating the use of RenalGuard to protect patients at high risk of AKI. JACC 2022; 15:1639-48

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) may occur in 2-7% of patients undergoing angiographic procedures. A variety of measures including hydration with sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and hemofiltration have been examined in randomized trials but no measure except adequate intravenous (IV) hydration and minimal contrast use have been shown to be effective strategies. The RenalGuard system (RG) is a device that delivers real-time isotonic IV hydration matched with frusemide-induced diuresis allowing hydration and contrast clearance thus preventing fluid overload and volume depletion. The STRENGTH study examined the superiority of RG over standard practice (considering the ESC guidelines including IV and oral hydration, the dose of contrast medium and staged procedure if necessary) in 259 patients with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (estimated GFR 15-40 ml/min/m2) requiring complex coronary, structural, or peripheral procedures with an expected contrast injection of at least 3x the estimated GFR. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3mg/dl and/or an increase of 25% of basal value at around day 3 or the requirement for dialysis within 5 days after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included a change in serum creatinine value and GFR at 12 months, % of patients on temporary or chronic haemodialysis at 12 months, and MACCEs. In the whole population, the mean age was 79 years, 50% were male, baseline GFR was 32ml/min/1.73m2, 48% underwent PCI, 34% structural intervention (TAVI and LAA closure), and 18% peripheral intervention. The mean amount of contrast use was similar in both groups (116ml in the RG group vs. 104ml in the control group; p=0.26). The total fluid intake was higher in the RG group (6196ml vs. 1407ml; p<0.0001). The primary endpoint was similar in the RG and control groups (15.9% vs. 13.9%; difference=2.4; 95% CI:-7.1-12; p=0.62). At 12 months, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The rate of MACCEs were also similar at a median of 342 days (20.5% in RG group vs. 22.2% in the control group).

A LOCAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY CENTRES

A LOCAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY CENTRES

Interventional cardiology services have undergone an enormous transformation in the last 20 years. The numbers of PCI procedures per year has increased substantially and the typical case mix has changed from a mostly elective service to the current day situation where most procedures are performed on patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. Patients are now typically older and sicker with PPCI, cardiogenic shock, out of hospital cardiac arrest, surgical turn downs, left mainstem and CTO procedures being common clinical situations. This increased risk profile has coincided with an era of greater scrutiny of doctors.

We are all expected to provide data on our individual clinical service for appraisal purposes. In addition, we may be required to discuss difficult cases with patients and their relatives, local serious incident enquiries, the Care Quality Commission, Coroners courts, the General Medical Council and even the police. When dealing with these challenging situations it may be very helpful for clinicians to have up to date information describing an overview of their practice as a whole in order to put an individual case in context.

The NICOR database of PCI procedures is one of the best of its kind and provides an excellent overview of procedures in the UK. Patients who do not have procedures performed do not appear on this database but local departments are still accountable for these cases. The purpose of this current document is to describe a local governance framework which can used by PCI centres on a voluntary basis. This is based on the system currently in use at the Essex Cardiothoracic Centre which works well and is popular with clinicians.

View the full document using the download link. 

R&D LITERATURE REVIEW SEPT 2020

R&D LITERATURE REVIEW SEPT 2020

BCIS R&D Group

Literature Review September 2020

Prepared by: Michael Mahmoudi, Julian Gunn, Paul Morris & Aung Myat

Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

 

STABLE CAD & ACS

 

Colchicine as a potent anti-inflammatory agent

Colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease.

NEJM 2020 Online

A number of studies have indicated that colchicine may have clinical benefits in patient with coronary artery disease (CAD). The low-dose colchicine (LoDoCo2) trial randomized 5522 patients with stable chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) to either colchicine 0.5mg daily (N=2762) or placebo (N=2760). Patients 35 to 82 years of age were eligible if they had any evidence of coronary disease on invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography angiography or a coronary artery calcium score of at least 400 Agatston units. Patients were required to have been in a clinically stable condition for at least 6 months before enrolment. Patients were excluded if they had moderate to severe renal impairment, severe heart failure, severe valvular heart disease, or known side effects from colchicine. At a median follow-up of 28.6 months, the primary endpoint (a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous MI, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization) was lower in the colchicine group (6.8% vs. 9.6%; incidence: 2.5 vs. 3.6 events per 100 person-years; HR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.83; p<0.001). The secondary endpoint (a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous MI, or ischemic stroke) was also lower in the colchicine group (4.2% vs. 5.7%; incidence: 1.5 vs. 2.1 events per 100 person-years; HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.57-0.92; p=0.007). The incidence rates of spontaneous MI or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization (composite endpoint), cardiovascular death or spontaneous MI (composite endpoint), ischemia driven coronary revascularization, and spontaneous MI were also significantly lower in the colchicine group. The incidence of death from non-cardiovascular causes was higher in the colchicine group (incidence: 0.7 vs. 0.5 events per 100 person-years; HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.99-2.31). The individual causes of death have not permitted a clear interpretation of this finding. The effects of colchicine were consistent in the prespecified subgroups defined according to sex, age (>65 years vs. ≤65 years), smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, prior acute coronary syndrome, prior coronary revascularization, atrial fibrillation, statin dose, and ezetimibe use.

 

Time to reconsider a strategy of 12 Months DAPT

Effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. ticagrelor with aspirin on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The TICO randomized clinical trial.

JAMA 2020; 323:2407-16

Bleeding complications following PCI are associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The current study tested the hypothesis whether a strategy of switching to ticagrelor monotherapy following a 3-months course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduced the 1-year net adverse clinical events defined as a composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, MI, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target vessel revascularization). Prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The study randomized 3056 ACS patients (36% with STEMI) to receive either ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-months of DAPT (N=1527) or ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (N=1529). The average was 61 years, 79% were men, 27% had diabetes, and all patients were treated with the Orsiro drug-eluting stent. The primary outcome was lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy after a 3-month course of DAPT (absolute difference, -1.98 (95% CI:-3.5% – -0.45%) HR: 0.66 (95% CI: 0.48-0.92); p=0.01). This difference was driven by a reduced risk of major bleeding in the ticagrelor monotherapy after a 3-month course of DAPT (1.7% vs. 3%; HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.34-0.91; p=0.02). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was similar in both groups (2.3% vs. 3.4%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.45-1.06; p=0.09). A prespecified subgroup analysis showed that ticagrelor monotherapy had a consistent effect on the primary outcome across subgroups except in patients with multivessel disease who did better with 12-month DAPT. The results of TICO have been confirmed in three additional meta-analysis. For example, McClure and colleagues (JAHA 2020; 9:e017109) undertook a meta-analysis of 5 muticenter trials including GLOBAL LEADERS, STOPDABT2, SMART-CHOICE, TWILIGHT and TICIO which in total included 32361 patients of whom16898 had a history of ACS demonstrated that compared to a 12 months course of DAPT, a strategy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy from 1 to 3 months after DAPT substantially reduces the risk of major and fatal bleeding. This strategy was also associated with a potentially protective effect for MACE and all-cause mortality.

 

De-escalation of DAPT-Time to change duration of DAPT

Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial.

Lancet 2020 Online

The concept of de-escalation is based on the hypothesis that there is a temporal change of ischaemic and bleeding risks after PCI. Immediately after PCI, especially in patients with ACS, the risk of thrombosis is greatest because the patient has a thrombotic milieu and the culprit coronary artery needs to recover from balloon-induced injury and dissection with exposure of the subendothelial tissue to blood. Upon endothelialisation of the implanted stent, the constant bleeding risk from using potent P2Y12 inhibitors comes sharper into focus and is maintained thereafter for the total duration of DAPT. This South Korean study was conducted at 35 hospitals to investigate the feasibility of a prasugrel-based dose de-escalation strategy in ACS patients proceeding to PCI. All ACS patients with at least 1 culprit coronary lesion in a native coronary artery requiring stent deployment were eligible for recruitment. From September 2014 to December 2018, 2338 patients were randomised to the de-escalation arm (N=1170) or to standard therapy (N=1168). All patients received loading doses of aspirin and prasugrel. After PCI all patients received 100 mg aspirin and 10 mg prasugrel once a day up to 30 days. Thereafter the de-escalation group took 5 mg of prasugrel once daily as maintenance and the conventional arm continued on prasugrel 10 mg once daily. Both arms continued aspirin. DAPT was recommended for a minimum of a year although this duration could be adjusted in the case of clinical events. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, clinically driven revascularisation, stroke, and bleeding events of grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, at 1 year. Mean age was 58.8 years. At 1 year, the primary endpoint occurred in 82 patients (7.2%) in the de-escalation group and 116 patients (10.1%) in the conventional group (absolute risk reduction -2.9%, Pnon-inferiority<0.0001; HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.92, Pequivalence=0.12). There was no increase in ischaemic risk (0.76 [0.40-1.45]; p=0.40), and the risk of bleeding events was significantly lower (0.48 [0.32-0.73]; p=0.0007) in favour of the de-escalation group. In post-hoc subgroup analyses, the clinical effect of de-escalation was consistent regardless of subgroup (age, sex, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, smoking status, type of ACS, ejection fraction, polyvascular disease, or stent length), with no significant interaction noted. The investigators were quick to emphasise the trial results were only applicable to east Asian ACS patients, so may not necessarily be generalisable to other ethnic cohorts.

 

Mortality benefit with PCI in patient with stable angina

Survival of Patients With Angina Pectoris Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Intracoronary Pressure Wire Guidance.

JACC 2020; 75:2785-99

The impact of coronary revascularization on hard clinical endpoint in patients with stable angina is controversial. The objective of the current study was to compare the association of FFR-guided versus angiography-guided PCI with long-term mortality, restenosis, and stent thrombosis and periprocedural complications (defined as in-hospital occurrence of procedure related death, neurological complications, cardiac tamponade, vessel perforation, vessel occlusion and major bleeding) in patients with stable angina registered in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). Between 2005-2016, a total of 23860 patients underwent PCI; FFR was used in 3367 patients and 20493 patients underwent PCI without intracoronary pressure measurements. Patients in the FFR group were younger, more likely to be men, and more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and previous PCI. After a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the adjusted risk estimates for all-cause mortality (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73-0.89; p<0.001) and stent thrombosis and restenosis (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.96; p=0.022) was lower in the FFR group. The periprocedural complications were similar between the two groups (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.77-1.19; p=697). Limitations of the study included lack of data regarding the rates of MI and the investigators were unable to distinguish between cardiac and non-cardiac death. There were important baseline differences between the two groups that may have influenced the results including patients in the FFR group were more likely to receive current generation DES, more likely to undergo PCI via the radial route, and more likely to receive ticagrelor as opposed to clopidogrel.

 

Trimetazidine safe but not particularly effective post PCI

Efficacy and safety of trimetazidine after percutaneous coronary intervention (ATPCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Lancet 2020;396:830-838

Trimetazidine is an antianginal agent widely used outside of Europe and the US. It works by enhancing the metabolic efficiency of the myocardium under threat of ischaemia but does not mediate any haemodynamic effects. The ATPCI trial was a large international multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in patients who had had successful PCI for either stable angina or NSTE-ACS within 30 days of study enrolment and subsequent randomisation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of cardiac death; hospital admission for a cardiac event; recurrent or persistent angina leading to adding, switching, or increasing the dose of one of the evidence-based antianginal therapies; or recurrent or persistent angina leading to coronary angiography. From September 2014 to June 2016, 6007 patients were randomised to trimetazidine at 35 mg twice daily (N=2998) or matching placebo (N=3009) on top of standard antianginal therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint event rate was lower than expected so follow-up was extended for a further 12 months. Overall median follow-up was 47.5 months. The frequencies of primary composite endpoint events were similar between trimetazidine (700 [23·3%] patients) and placebo (714 [23·7%]; HR: 0∙98; 95% CI: 0∙88–1∙09; p=0∙73), as were the frequencies of the components analysed individually. Neither all-cause mortality nor the composite of hospital admission for myocardial infarction (fatal or non-fatal) or cardiac death, or any of the other secondary endpoints were modified by assigned treatment. The investigators concluded that trimetazidine did not reduce the risk of cardiac events compared with placebo. In the ATPCI population, where atherosclerotic burden was generally low (approximately half had only single-vessel disease) and most recruits had preserved left ventricular function, combining successful PCI with optimal preventive and antianginal therapy was probably sufficient for symptom control in most cases. Importantly the study drug was not associated with any safety issues.

 

Age not a barrier to revascularization in NSTEMI patients

Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data.

Lancet 2020;396:623-34

The very elderly (≥80 years old) are typically under-represented in randomised trials of NSTE-ACS management. Furthermore, the evidence base used to support contemporary practice guidelines in the elderly comprise mainly observational data and meta-analyses. Randomised controlled trial data are scant, heterogeneous in relation to what age stratum is designated elderly and beset by small sample populations. There have been just two randomised trials of optimal NSTE-ACS management strategy conducted specifically in the very elderly (≥80 years). The Italian Elderly ACS Study and the Norwegian After Eighty trial. The UK multicentre RINCAL trial has completed but had to end prematurely due to slow recruitment. The results are awaiting formal publication. The much larger BHF-funded SENIOR RITA (NCT03052036) trial is also looking at optimal management strategy in the elderly, but here the cut-off for enrolment is ≥75 years. This trial is aiming to recruit 1668 participants with an estimated study completion date of 2029. Here SENIOR-NSTEMI is yet another retrospective observational cohort study designed to estimate the effect of invasive versus non-invasive management of NSTE-ACS in patients aged ≥80 years on survival using routinely collected clinical data from 5 academic medical centres hosting NIHR BRCs in the UK via the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative. Notably, the investigators have employed statistical methods to minimise the effects of immortal time bias in particular whereby previous registry studies had assigned, rightly or wrongly, those patients who died early in the course of their presentation to the non-invasive arm of their analysis before an invasive strategy could even be considered. Overall the records of 1976 patients from a study period starting in January 2008 to April 2017 were included in the analysis. Propensity scores were derived for those with high probabilities for a conservative or invasive strategy, leaving 1500 patients that could have been amenable to either strategy. The median age was 86 (IQR 82-89). Overall the adjusted cumulative 5-year mortality was 36% in the invasive arm and 55% in the conservative arm (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84). An invasive strategy was associated with a lower incidence of hospital admission for heart failure (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.93). This is an important study, albeit based on retrospective observational data, that helps to strengthen the advocacy for early intervention in those patients ≥80 years old presenting with NSTE-ACS.

 

Focus on the culprit lesion in cardiogenic shock

Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:1171-78

There are conflicting studies on the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel CAD (MVCAD) who present with STEMI and cardiogenic shock. The landmark CULPRIT-SHOCK trial showed improved survival at 30 days when using a strategy of culprit vessel only PCI (CV-PCI) as opposed to multivessel PCI (MV-PCI). To date, studies comparing revascularization strategies with the aid of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) have been limited. The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCSI) trial, encompassing 57 hospitals in the US, sought to assess clinical outcomes associated with the use of a shock protocol emphasizing early MCS and PCI in patients presenting with acute MI and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). The algorithm is based upon (1) early identification and cath lab activation for patients presenting with AMICS, (2) early use of MCS, and (3) routine use of invasive haemodynamic monitoring with PA catheter to guide management of MCS and use of inotropes. Of 198 patients with MVCAD , 126 (64%) underwent MV-PCI and 72 (36%) underwent CV-PCI. The MV-PCI group had a trend toward more severe impairment of cardiac output and worse lactate clearance on presentation, and cardiac performance was significantly worse at 12 hours. 24 hours from PCI, the haemometabolic derangements were similar. Survival rates (69.8% vs. 65.3%; p=0.51) and acute kidney injury (29.9% vs. 34.2%; p=0.64) were similar between the MV-PCI and CV-PCI groups. The major strength of this study is that patients were treated using a robust protocol as defined by the NCSI and differs from other studies in that patients were treated with early and aggressive use of MCS. However, major limitations include lack of randomization, modest sample size, and the decision to perform nonculprit PCI was left at the discretion of the operator. It is feasible to assume that more straightforward nonculprit lesions were selected for PCI whilst more complex lesions were deferred for potential surgical revascularization at a later date.

 

STENTS AND BALLOONS

 

BioFreedom not as good as Orsiro in SORT OUT IX

Randomized Comparison of the Polymer-Free Biolimus-Coated BioFreedom Stent With the Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Orsiro Stent in an All-Comers Population Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The SORT OUT IX Trial.

Circ 2020; 141:2052-63

Although the biolimus A9-coated BioFreedom stent, a stainless-steel drug-coated stent free from polymer has shown superiority to BMS, its performance against modern DES has not been tested. The Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome IX (SORT OUT IX) was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of BioFreedom drug-coated stent with the biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro) in reducing clinical outcomes in 3151 patients undergoing PCI. Mean age was 66.3 ± 10.9 years, 19.3% had diabetes, and 53% presented with ACS). The primary endpoint, MACE, was defined as the composite of cardiac death, MI not related to any segment other than the target lesion, or target lesion revascularization. The trial was powered to assess noninferiority for MACE events of the BioFreedom (N=1572) with the Orsiro stent (N=1579) with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 0.021.  At 1 year, the primary endpoints 5% in the BioFreedom stent group and 3.7% in the Orsiro stent group (HR:1.34;95% CI: 0.96-1.89; p for noninferiority=0.14, p for superiority=0.09). The BioFreedom stent therefore did not meet the criteria for noninferiority driven by a higher risk of target lesion revascularization (3.5% vs. 1.3%; p<0.0001). This may be due to the thicker stent struts in the BioFreedom stent (120 micometers) than the Orsiro stent (60-80 micrometers). The rates of cardiac mortality (1% vs. 1.8%; p=0.06) and MI not related to other lesion (1.7% vs. 1.6%; p=0.99) were similar in both groups. In the LEADERS FREE and LEADERS FREE II trials, the BioFreedom stent were superior to BMS suggesting that its efficacy may lie somewhere between BMS and contemporary DES.

 

Biologically coated stents may represent a new paradigm in PCI

Titanium-Nitride-Oxide–Coated Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome. The Randomized TIDES-ACS Trial.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:1697-1705

Three randomized trials with 5 years of follow-up have indicated that a stainless steel, titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stent resulted in superior clinical outcomes compared with zotarolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stents. Stent coating with a vapor deposition of titanium in a mixed nitrogen-oxygen atmosphere aims to achieve inhibition of platelet aggregation while limiting neointimal hyperplasia without an antiproliferative drug. The Comparison  Titanium-Nitride-Oxide Coated Bioactive-Stent (Optimax) to the Drug (Everolimus) Eluting Stent (Synergy) in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TIDES-ACS) trial of 1491 ACS patients sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the cobalt-chromium-based titanium-nitride oxide coated stent (TiNO) (N=989) with the Synergy stent (N=502). The trial met both its hypotheses of noninferiority concerning a composite of major adverse ischemic events at 12 months (6.3% vs. 7.0%; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.71-1.22; p<0.001 for noninferiority) and superiority concerning a composite of ischemic and bleeding events at 18 months (3.7% vs. 7.8%; HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.51-0.80; p=0.001). Salient features in interpreting the data include few patients with diabetes (12%), two-thirds had single vessel disease, and only one-third had complex angiographic features.

 

To DEB or to DES-that is the question

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis.

JACC 2020; 75:2664-78

The optimal treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is uncertain. The Difference in Antirestenotic Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stent and Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Occurrence of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis (DAEDALUS) study is a pooled analysis of individual patient data (N=1976) from 10 randomized clinical trials that sought to compare long-term outcomes between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and repeat stenting with drug-eluting stent (DES) according to bare metal stent (BMS) and DES-ISR and individually assess the relative safety and efficacy of treatments between ISR types. A total of 710 patients with BMS-ISR (724 lesions) and 1248 patients with DES-ISR (1338 lesions) underwent treatment by DCB angioplasty or repeat stenting with DES. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, MI, or target lesion thrombosis. The primary efficacy endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) defined as any revascularization, percutaneous or surgical, due to recurrent stenosis of the target lesion segment. At 3-year follow-up, in patients with BMS-ISR, the primary safety (8.7% vs. 7.5%; HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.65-1.96) and efficacy (9.2% vs. 10.2%; HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.51-1.37) endpoints were similar with both treatments. In patients with DES-ISR, the risk of the primary efficacy endpoint was higher with DCB angioplasty than with repeat DES implantation (20.3% vs. 13.4%; HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.16-2.13) whereas the risk of the primary safety endpoint was numerically lower (9.5% vs. 13.3%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47-1.00). Regardless of the treatment used, the risk of TLR was lower in BMS-versus DES-ISR (9.7% vs. 17.0%; HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.42-0.74), whereas safety was not significantly different between ISR types. Several limitations of the analysis are noteworthy. Firstly, post-procedure minimum lumen diameter was less and percent residual stenosis greater in the DCB arm despite randomization. Second, although 1-year TLR was increased after DCB, binary angiographic restenosis rates were similar across all the trials. Third, a signal for hazard with restenting was observed with non-significant trends for all-cause death, cardiac death, and for death, MI, and target lesion thrombosis. Finally, the DCB in the DAEDALUS study were paclitaxel whilst the newer sirolimus DCB may be more effective in suppressing neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis.

 

More data in favour of Biodegradable polymer coated stents

Final 3-year outcomes of MiStent biodegradable polymer crystalline sirolimus-eluting stent versus Xience permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent. Insights from the DESSOLVE III all-comers randomized trial.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:e008737

A number of studies have confirmed the superiority of ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer second-generation DES to first generation DES and noninferiority to the thin-strut second-generation permanent polymer DES. Data on the longer-term performance of ultrathin DES is lacking. The Multicentre Randomized Study of the MiStent Sirolimus Eluting Absorbable Polymer Stent System for Revascularization of Coronary Arteries (DESSOLVE III) trial randomized 1398 all-comers patients with any ischemic coronary syndrome and any type of lesion (left main, SVG, CTO, bifurcation, ISR) to either the MiStent sirolimus eluting stent (N=703) or a Xience stent (N=695). The primary endpoint was device-oriented composite endpoint, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoint was patient-oriented composite endpoint, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, MI, or any revascularization. At 3 years, the primary endpoint was similar in both groups (10.5% vs. 11.5%; p=0.55). Rates of cardiac death (3.9% vs. 3.8%; p=0.88), target vessel MI (3.2% vs. 2.5%; p=0.43), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (5.2% vs. 6.5%;p=0.30) were similar in both groups. The risk of patient oriented composite endpoint was also similar in both groups (22.7% vs. 22.9%; p=0.34).

 

CATHETER BASED VALVULAR INTERVENTION

 

Antiplatelet therapy post TAVI

Aspirin with or without clopidogrel after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

NEJM 2020 Online

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for a period of 3 to 6 months is recommended after TAVI in patients who do not have an indication for anticoagulation. Although small studies have indicated that such combination is associated with a lower incidence of ischemic events than aspirin alone, although dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased risk of bleeding in the ARTE trial. Cohort A of the POPular TAVI trial (Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation) compared aspirin alone (N=343) with aspirin plus clopidogrel for 3 months (N=347) in patients undergoing TAVI who did not have an established indication for long-term oral anticoagulation. The two primary outcomes were all bleeding (including minor, major, and life-threatening or disabling bleeding), and non-procedure-related bleeding over a period of 12 months. The two secondary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, non-procedure-related bleeding, stroke, or MI and a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, ischemic stroke, or MI at 1 year for both outcomes sequentially for noninferiority and superiority. At 12 months, the rate of bleeding of any type was lower in the aspirin alone group (15.1% vs. 26.6%; RR, 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.77; p=0.001). Non-procedure-related bleeding was also lower in the aspirin alone group (15.1% vs. 24.9%; RR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44-0.83; p=0.005).   The first secondary endpoint (composite of bleeding, death, stroke or MI) was also lower in the aspirin alone group (23% vs. 31.3%; difference -8.2 percentage points; 95% CI for noninferiority: -14.9-1-.5; p<0.001; RR, 0.74; 95% CI for superiority: 0.57-0.95; p=0.04). The second secondary endpoint (composite of thromboembolic events including death from CV causes, ischemic stroke, or MI) were 9.7% in the aspirin group and 9.9% in the aspirin plus clopidogrel group indicating that aspirin alone was noninferior to combined therapy (difference -0.2 percentage points; 95% CI for noninferiority: -4.7-4.3; p=0.004) but it was not superior (RR, 0.98; 95% CI for superiority: 0.62-1.55; p=0.93).

 

Leaflet thrombosis an issue in both surgical & TAVI devices

Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves. PARTNER 3 Cardiac Computed Tomography Sub-study.

JACC 2020; 75:3003-15

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis characterized by hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and reduced leaflet motion (RLM) seen on high resolution 4D CT is found with significant frequency both in transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic valves. Given the expansion of TAVI across the full spectrum of surgical risks, the US FDA has FDA mandated CT ancillary studies to be incorporated into TAVI trials of patients at low surgical risk to understand the natural history of subclinical leaflet thrombosis of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic valves and its association with valve haemodynamic and clinical outcomes. The PARTNER 3 CT substudy was a randomized trial embedded in the PARTNER 3 randomized trial of TAVI with current generation balloon-expandable valve compared with standard surgical AVR in patients at low surgical risk with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had no pre-existing indication for anticoagulation and no contraindication to undergo a CT scan. Patients underwent cardiac 4D-CT at 30 days and 1 year after TAVI or SAVR . Treating investigators were blinded to the results of the CT scans. Primary imaging endpoints of interest were the percent HALT and RLM at 30 days and 1 year. HALT was significantly higher in the TAVI group at 30 days (13% vs. 5%; p=0.03) but not at 1 year (28% vs. 20%; p=0.19). The presence of HALT fluctuated over time, such that amongst patients with HALT at 30 days spontaneous resolution was observed at 1 year in 56% of cases. Conversely, amongst patients without HALT at 30 days, new HALT was observed in 21% of patients at 1 year. HALT at any time point was associated with higher rates of valve thrombosis, stroke, TIA, and thromboembolic complications. The presence of HALT did not significantly alter the mean aortic valve gradient at 30 days or 1 year. When placed in the context of the ancillary GALLILEO 4D-study where a rivaroxaban-based strategy did not translate into significant improvements in valve haemodynamic as evaluated with TTE or reduction in thromboembolic events, a strategy of routine anticoagulation after TAVI appears to have an unfavourable risk-benefit balance.

 

Incidence & predictors of IE in TAVI

Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

JACC 2020; 75:3020-30

The incidence of infective endocarditis following TAVI, the responsible microorganisms, and the outcome of such patients has not been adequately elucidated. Using the Swiss Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry, the current study examined the incidence of TAVI prosthetic valve endocarditis, risk factors for developing the disease, and the downstream incidence of stroke and mortality. Between 2011-2018, 7203 patients underwent TAVI at 15 Swiss centres. During follow-up of 14832 patient-years, endocarditis occurred in 149 patients. The incidence of peri-procedural, delayed-early, and late endocarditis was 2.59, 0.71, and 0.40 events per 100 person-years respectively. Enterococcus species were the most common microorganism in early endocarditis (30.1%). Younger age, male sex, lack of predilatation, and treatment in the cath lab as opposed to a hybrid operating room were independently associated with endocarditis. In a case-control matched analysis, patients with endocarditis were at increased risk of mortality (HR: 6.55; 95% VI: 4.44-9.67) and stroke (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.54-10.52). Of note, the modified Duke criteria had a very low sensitivity with only 63% of patients meeting a definite diagnosis. Furthermore, echocardiographic appearances were normal or inconclusive in 47.7%.

 

Neurocognitive impairment post TAVI

Evolution, Predictors, and Neurocognitive Effects of Silent Cerebral Embolism During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:1291-1300

Histopathological examination of embolic debris captured during TAVI has confirmed its dual origin from both the aortic valve and the aortic wall. In addition to symptomatic stroke or TIA, systematic performance of brain imaging after TAVI has shown a high incidence of silent cerebral ischaemic lesions (SCILs) raising concerns for increased risk of cognitive impairment post TAVI. The current study examined the incidence, time course, and predictors of SCILs and their impact on neurocognition in 96 patients who underwent cerebral MRI within 7 days prior to and again post TAVI. The MRI was repeated after 3 months if results were abnormal. Patients with neurological or neurocognitive impairment were excluded. SCILs were observed in 76% of patients, distributed in all vascular territories, with a median number of 2 lesions, a median diameter of 4.5mm, and a median total volume of 140 mm3. Independent predictors of SCIL occurrence were higher baseline age-related white matter change score, and the use of self-expanding or mechanically expanded bioprostheses. SCIL occurrence was associated with a more pronounced transient neurocognitive decline early after TAVI and lower recovery at follow-up. Important limitations of the study included the low number of patients enrolled, slow recruitment (6 patients per year per centre), limited follow-up with the last evaluation at 3 months post TAVI, and the modest magnitude of change in the Mini Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores raising the question of whether these changes are clinically meaningful.

 

Encouraging long-term data for TAVI

Long-term clinical outcome and performance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expandable bioprosthesis.

EHJ 2020; 41:1876-86

TAVI has transformed the management of severe aortic stenosis, first in high-risk, frail, elderly patients, then in patients at moderate surgical risk and increasingly, in those in lower risk groups. Initially, evidence demonstrated superiority to standard care in inoperable patients and non-inferiority to surgery in high and medium risk groups. However, questions regarding long term outcomes had to remain uncomfortably unanswered until sufficient time had elapsed to allow appropriate analysis. TAVI has been available for little over a decade now and studies with ≥ 5 years follow-up data are emerging. In this study, outcomes following implantation of the first-generation self-expandable CoreValve bioprosthesis were studied in 999 patients, across eight Italian centres. These were predominantly elderly patients (mean age 82 y), at high surgical risk (mean Log-EuroSCORE 23) with reasonable LV function and severe valve disease (mean gradient 53 mmHg). Femoral access was used in 84% and 74% were under local anaesthetic. Follow up was for a median of 4.4 years with the longest at 11 years. Cumulative incidence functions (which control for increasing mortality rates over time) were used to analyse 8-year data. Overall mortality was 78% with median survival of 4.2 years. 36% of deaths were deemed to be cardiovascular in nature. In surviving patients NYHA remained at ≤ 2 in 79% and trans valvular gradient did not change from discharge (9±6 mmHg). Although paravalvular leak was common (CT sizing was not used routinely), there was no significant change in PVL over time. Moderate and severe structural valve deterioration at 8 years were 3.0% and 1.6% respectively. Late BVF was 2.5%. The study is one of the biggest studies of long term TAVI outcomes and is multicentre. Similar to other recent registry reports, the mortality in this elderly, frail, high risk group was high. However, it is reassuring that, in surviving patients, measures of valve function (gradient and PVL) and metrics of device failure did not reveal any overt red flags in terms of safety. Although unavoidable, perhaps the greatest problem when interpreting this uncontrolled study is common to many long-term observational studies; by the time they are reported, there has been considerable evolution in device design, implant technique, supporting medical therapy and, as is the case with TAVI, the age and frailty of the patients.

 

MISCELLANEOUS

 

More is better in LM PCI

Are higher operator volumes for unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention associated with improved patient outcomes? A survival analysis of 6724 procedures from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society National Database.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:e008782

A historical debate regarding operator volume and patient outcome in all field of medicine has continued to the present day. This study has examined the relationship between operator volume and patient survival after unprotected left main PCI ((ULMS-PCI) utilising data from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society National Database (BCIS). A total of 6724 ULMS-PCI procedures were analysed between 2012-2014 and 4 quartiles of annualized volumes (Q1-Q4) were generated.  Operator volume ranged from 1 to 54 cases/year. In Q1, 347 operators performed a median of 2 procedures/year; in Q2, 134 operators performed a median of 5 procedures/year; in Q3, 59 operators performed a mean of 10 procedures/year, and in Q4, 29 operators performed a mean of 21 procedures/year. Higher volume operators tackled patients with greater morbidity and greater complexity of disease burden. Adjusted in-hospital survival (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.67; p<0.001), in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.27-0.62; p<0.001), and 12-month survival (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.73; p<0.001) were lower in Q4 operators than Q1 operators. The authors have identified a lower volume threshold of ≥ 16 ULMS-PCI cases/year to be associated with improved patient survival.

 

 

 

What is the optimal bifurcation technique?

Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial.

EHJ 2020; 41:2523-36

The optimal bifurcation strategy is yet to be determined despite a number of landmark studies favouring a provisional single stent strategy. The current study was designed to assess the benefits of two-stent techniques in patients with DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Consecutive patients (N=653) were enrolled if they presented with silent ischaemia, stable or unstable angina (50%), or MI > 24 hours prior to treatment (22%). All bifurcation lesions were Medina 1,1,1 or 0, 1, 1 with reference vessel diameter (RVD) in the SB ≥ 2.5mm by visual estimation and had to meet the DEFINITION criteria. The DEFINITIONS criteria, developed from a previous registry, consists of any one major criterion (SB lesion length >10mm with diameter stenosis of SB >70% for distal LM bifurcation lesions or >90% for non-LM bifurcation lesions) plus any two minor criteria (moderate-to-severe calcification, multiple lesions, bifurcation angle < 45° or > 70°, main vessel RVD < 2.5mm, thrombus-containing lesions, or main vessel lesion length >25mm). Patients were randomised to either a provisional (N=325) or two-stent strategy (N=328; 77.8% DK-crush and 17.9% culotte); 62.5% of lesions in the trial were LAD/diagonal and 28.7% at the LMS. At the 1-year follow-up, the primary endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF) (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) was greater in the provisional group (11.4% vs. 6.1%; HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.90; p=0.019). The difference was driven by lower 1-year rates of target vessel MI (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20-0.90; p=0.025) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-1.0; p=0.049). There were no differences in the rates of cardiac death, all-cause death, or stent thrombosis. Of note, the Kaplan-Meier curves examining the main endpoint are unusual in that all the events seemed to occur immediately after the index procedure, and well before 30 days, with few events between then and the 12-month timepoint. Looking back at the definitions of the primary endpoint, it turns out that this must have comprised peri-procedural infarcts (defined according to enzyme rise or ECG change) or angiography defined vessel failure. This rather important aspect of the study is not explored in the prose of the results or the discussion.

 

DK-crush may be the optimal bifurcation strategy??

Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13:1432-44

Despite robust randomized data favouring a provisional one stent strategy, the optimal technique for bifurcation lesions remains unresolved. The current meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials including 5711 patients treated using 5 bifurcation techniques (provisional (N=1952), T stenting/T and protrusion (N=392), crush (1361), culotte (N=1101), and DK-crush (N=905)) studied MACE, cardiac death, MI, target vessel or lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis. Patients had a mean age of 64±10 years, 71% were men, 22% had diabetes, and 50% presented with stable angina. Over a median follow-up of 12 months, DK-crush was associated with a lower rate of MACE compared with other techniques (OR vs. provisional: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.26-0.55). This was driven by a reduction in target vessel revascularization (OR vs. provisional 0.39; 95% CI: 0.26-0.55) and target lesion revascularization (OR vs. provisional: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.22-0.57). There were no differences in the rates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, MI and stent thrombosis among the five techniques studied. DK-crush was associated with significantly fewer MIs compared to classic crush (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.1400.86). DK-crushed ranked first in probability of being the best treatment for all outcomes, followed by culotte and provisional stenting. T/TAP and crush were least likely to be the best treatment. Pairewise meta-analyses showed that the benefit of 2-stent techniques was observed in bifurcation lesions with side branch length ≥ 10mm whereas no difference was observed in outcomes between 1 and 2 stent techniques in bifurcation lesions with side branch lesion length < 10mm.

 

MIRACLE2 may streamline management for OOHCA

A practical risk score for early prediction of neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: MIRACLE2

EHJ 2020 Online

The management of patients presenting with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) is variable depending upon the presence or absence of ST-elevation on the presenting ECG and the patient’s premorbid status. Despite many approaches that may improve survival, a significant proportion of patients still sustain poor outcomes due to hypoxic brain injury. The purpose of this study was to develop a practical point-based risk score that can be applied to patients with OOHCA on arrival to a Heart Attack Centre (HAC) to reflect long-term prognosis and support clinical decision making. The study included 1055 patients aged ≥ 18 years presenting with an OOHCA and return of spontaneous circulation between May 2012-December 2017 of whom 373 were included in the King’s Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry. Inclusion criteria were the presence of ST-elevation on the ECG and patients without ST-elevation if there if there was absence of a noncardiac aetiology. Prediction modelling and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors of poor neurological outcome classified as Cerebral Performance Category 3-5 (severe disability-death) at 6-month follow-up. This was externally validated in two independent cohorts comprising 473 patients. Seven independent predictors of outcome were identified: missed (unwitnessed) arrest, initial non shockable rhythm, nonreactive pupils, age (60-80 years: 1 point; >80 years: 3 points), changing intra-arrest rhythms, low pH < 7.20, and epinephrine administration (2 points). The MIRACLE2 score had an AUC=0.90 in the development and 0.84/0.91 in the validation cohorts. Three risk score were identified: MIRACLE≤ 2: 5.6%risk of poor outcome;  MIRACLE2 3-4: 55.4% risk of poor outcome; MIRACLE≥ 5: 92.3% risk of poor outcome. The MIRACLE2 had a superior discrimination to the OHCA score and the Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis Score, but it performed as well as the Target Temperature Management score. These findings help define subgroup of patients where an early invasive strategy may be futile. Since the risk score was derived and validated in retrospective populations, there is now a requirement to prospectively validate it in larger cohorts and across different health care systems prior to its routine use.

 

Novel markers of plaque instability

Progression of ultrasound plaque attenuation and low echogenicity associates with major adverse cardiovascular events.

EHJ 2020; 41:2695-73

Although several pathological features of atherosclerotic plaque are known to be associated with instability and ACS, accurately identifying lesions likely to erode or rupture remains a scientific and clinical ambition. It is challenging because neither the anatomical (angiography, OCT, IVUS) nor physiological (FFR, iFR, CFR) tests that we use, and rely upon, can accurately characterise or predict plaque behaviour. In this study two specific IVUS ‘signature’ appearances were studied: (a) attenuated plaque (AP) characterized by a hypoechoic area with deep ultrasonic attenuation in the absence of calcium and (b) echolucent plaque (ELP) characterized by an intraplaque zone of absent or low echogenicity. The authors sought to associate these imaging biomarkers with clinical outcomes in a post hoc analysis of patients with one or more stenosis (≥20%) at invasive angiography.  Patients underwent IVUS at baseline and again after two years of medical therapy. IVUS was performed in arteries with no stenoses >50%, and no previous revascularisation and with no evidence that it was the culprit of a previous MI. Core laboratory, manually traced, AP and ELP, were performed at 1mm intervals. Of the 1497 patients studied, 18.8% had AP or ELP at baseline. These tended to be males, with an ACS history, diabetic, and had higher percentage stenoses and total atheroma volumes. These patients had a twofold increase in MACE compared with those without AP/ELP at baseline (8.2% vs. 3.9% p<0.01). 10.7% experienced either new or increased AP/ELP. In these patients MACE was even higher compared to those that did not experience progression (10.0% vs. 4.1%, p<0.001). Differences were driven by MI, revascularisation and stroke, as there were no deaths. Interestingly, many patients experienced a decrease in AP/ELP, demonstrating that vulnerable plaque can heal or regress with OMT. The focus on signature appearances appears to be a pragmatic approach that could aid translation into real world practice. Although the criteria and algorithms for calculating the ELP and AP indices appears complicated, the algorithms could likely be automated if this is commercially opportune. However, the proverbial ‘elephant in the room’ is the relevance to real-world clinical practice?  It will be fascinating to see if the results of studies like this one will translate into clear clinical benefit, i.e. will any medical or interventional treatment strategies be shown to improve clinical outcomes when targeted specifically at patients with high risk imaging appearances?

 

ACE inhibitors are safe in the COVID-19 era

Use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital: a case-population study.

Lancet 2020; 395:1705-14

The SARS-CoV-2 virus uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the receptor for its spike protein to invade host cells and replicate. There is a high degree of homology between ACE2 and ACE, and so naturally there was concern that those taking ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be predisposed to a more severe episode of COVID-19 if infected. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors also upregulate the expression of ACE2. Impromptu cessation of these drugs, however, could cause inadvertent harm to those patients with ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease secondary to diabetes, already taking them. The very conditions which are notably prevalent in patients with the most severe COVID-19 infections. To study the putative detrimental effect of RAAS inhibitors, investigators from seven hospitals in Madrid performed a case-population study in which 1139 PCR-confirmed cases of COVID-19 were compared against 10 controls per case (N=11390), individually matched for age, sex, region, and date of hospital admission extracted from a primary healthcare database. The study found no significant increase in the risk of COVID-19 requiring hospital admission associated with the administration of ACE inhibitors or ARBs, either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs. When stratified according to age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, and baseline cardiovascular risk, no significant interaction was observed with any of these variables, other than diabetes, for which RAAS inhibitors were associated with a significantly reduced risk of hospital admission in the context of COVID-19 infection. The investigators have postulated a possible imbalance of ACE:ACE2 in favour of ACE in the lungs of diabetics underpinning this interesting result. This would mean greater ACE activity with simultaneous downregulation of ACE2 by SARS-CoV-2 which would lead to a more serious infection unless there was RAAS inhibitor protection opposing this.

R&D LITERATURE REVIEW MAY 2020

R&D LITERATURE REVIEW MAY 2020

BCIS R&D Group

Literature Review May 2020

Prepared by: Michael Mahmoudi, Julian Gunn, Paul Morris & Aung Myat

Edited by Michael Mahmoudi

STABLE CAD & ACS

Is there a role for revascularization in stable angina?

Invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary artery disease?

NEJM 2020; 382:1395-1407

The preferred contemporary approach to the management of stable angina is not well defined. Two strategies are commonly used: (a) guideline based medical therapy including antianginal drugs as well as disease modifying agents and (b) an invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography followed by PCI or CABG plus medical therapy.  The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial tested whether an initial invasive strategy would result in better outcomes than a conservative strategy in 5179 patients with stable angina and moderate or severe myocardial ischemia with regards to the primary endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest. Key exclusion criteria were GFR < 30, recent ACS, unprotected left main stenosis of at least 50%, LV ejection fraction < 35%, NYHA class III or IV heart failure, and “unacceptable angina” despite the use of medical therapy. The majority of patients also underwent CTCA at screening to confirm the presence of obstructive CAD and exclude left main disease. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative strategy group (difference 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI: 0.8-3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rates were also similar (16.4% vs. 18.2%; difference -1.8 percentage points; 95% CI: -4.7-1.0). The difference in outcomes was driven by results for MI and those results depended on the definition used in the analysis. Of note, patients in the invasive strategy reported fewer angina symptoms than patients in the conservative group although the magnitude of this benefit depended on angina frequency at baseline with 35% having no angina at baseline. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a trend for a greater number of MI (predominantly procedural) in the invasive strategy group during the first 6 months of the trial but as the trial proceeded the curves crossed and more MI (predominantly spontaneous) occurred in the conservative group. Finally, at 4 years, the cumulative incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or MI based on the primary definition was higher in the conservative strategy group  (13.9% vs. 11.7%). It is possible that ISCHEMIA ended before a substantial difference in favour of the invasive strategy emerged.

Should morphine be replaced by another analgesic agent in ACS patients?

Morphine and cardiovascular outcomes among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary angiography.

JACC 2020; 75:289-300

Morphine is routinely utilised in the management of acute chest pain in patients presenting with ACS. From a pharmacological perspective, morphine and other opiates delay gastric emptying thus compromising intestinal absorption of P2Y12 inhibitors. A number of small studies have demonstrated that morphine reduced active metabolite exposure and antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in stable patients post ACS, in acute MI, and during elective PCI. The current study was designed to explore the association between morphine and ischemic events in 5,438 patients treated with clopidogrel in the context of non-ST-segment elevation ACS in the EARLY-ACS trial. Patients that were not treated with clopidogrel (n=3,462) were used as negative controls. At 96 hours, morphine use was associated with higher rates of the composite endpoint of death, MI, recurrent ischemia, or thrombotic bailout (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04-1.87; p=0.026). There was a trend for higher rates of death or MI at 30 days (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.98-1.70; p=0.072). The results question a routine strategy of routine morphine use in ACS patients or delaying the administration of clopidogrel loading dose until the time of PCI when the effects of morphine may have subsided.

Antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients presenting with NSTEMI

Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label non-inferiority trial.

Lancet 2020;395:1374-81

Landmark trials such as PLATO and TRITON-TIMI 38  have demonstrated the advantage of a more potent antiplatelet effect from ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel. The elderly who are often at high risk from thrombotic and bleeding events have been underrepresented in such trials. Investigators from the Netherlands randomised 1002 patients aged ≥70 presenting with NSTE-ACS 1:1 to clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel along with standard therapy for 12 months. There were two co-primary endpoints. The safety endpoint was any bleeding requiring medical intervention, defined as PLATO major or minor bleeding. The net clinical benefit outcome was a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke and PLATO major or minor bleeding. The median age was 77 (IQR 73-81) in the clopidogrel arm (n=500) and 77 (IQR 73-82) in the ticagrelor arm (n=502). There were 64% men and 36% women recruited. Given the open-label construct of the trial, 95% (475/502) of those in the prasugrel/ticagrelor cohort were prescribed ticagrelor. This was to be expected given the contraindications and cautionary advice associated with prasugrel in those ≥75 years old. The primary bleeding endpoint was significantly lower in the clopidogrel arm (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.94; p=0.02 for superiority). The net clinical benefit endpoint satisfied the non-inferiority threshold in the clopidogrel arm (absolute risk difference -4%, 95% CI -10.0-1.4; p=0.03) but not for superiority (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66-1.03; p=0.11). In essence, treatment with clopidogrel in elderly NSTE-ACS patients resulted in lower bleeding events but not at the cost of greater thrombotic events. The trial was not powered to test for differences in mortality. One of the most important findings of the study was the rate of study drug discontinuation. Only 53% of patients completed their 12-month course of ticagrelor compared to 78% in the clopidogrel cohort, predominantly due to bleeding, dyspnoea and need for chronic oral anticoagulation.

ONYX ONE supports shorter DAPT duration

Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.

NEJM 2020; 382:1208-18

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy particularly in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo PCI has not been determined. The ONYX ONE trial compared the polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) (Resolute Onyx; Medtronic; n=1,003) with the polymer-free umirolimus-coated stent (UCS) (Biofreedom; BioSensors; n=993) in patients undergoing PCI and who were deemed at high-bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of DAPT, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was death from cardiac causes, MI, or stent thrombosis. The secondary outcome was target lesion failure, a composite of death from cardiac causes, target vessel MI, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 17.1% in the ZES group and 16.9% in the UCS group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI: 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; p=0.01 for noninferiority). The secondary outcome occurred in 17.6% of the ZES group and 17.4% of the UCS group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI: 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; p=0.007 for noninferiority). Important limitations of the trial included its single-blind nature, noninferiority testing of the primary and secondary outcomes, and lack of a control group taking DAPT for a longer duration.

PHYSIOLOGY & IMAGING

Invasive physiology use remains  modest in stable CAD

Utilization and outcomes of measuring fractional flow reserve in patients with stable ischemic heart disease.

JACC 2020; 75:409-19

FFR/iFR guided revascularization is considered the gold standard for invasive assessment of ischemia. Despite evidence from clinical trials and recommendations from the American and European societies FFR/iFR use remains limited with large differences between countries and health systems. The current study sought to evaluate contemporary, real-world patterns of FFR use and its effect on outcomes in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and angiographically intermediate disease (40% to 69% stenosis by visual assessment. A total of 17,989 patients were identified through the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. Over a period of 8 years (2009-2017), the rate of FFR use gradually increased from 14.8% to 18.5% in patients with intermediate lesions, and from 44% to 75% in patients undergoing PCI. One-year mortality was significantly lower in the FFR group (2.8% vs. 5.9%; p<0.001). After adjustment for patient, site-level, and procedural factors, FFR-guided revascularization was associated with a 43% lower risk of mortality at 1 year compared with angiography-only revascularization.

IVUS a MUST for left main PCI

Intravascular Imaging and 12-Month Mortality After Unprotected Left Main Stem PCI. An Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:346-57

Despite intravascular imaging being shown to improve PCI outcomes in both randomized trials and registries, its use to optimise PCI remains limited. The current study has utilised the UK National PCI Audit to explore temporal changes in and implications of the use of IVUS for unprotected LM PCI in 11,264 patients. Imaging guidance significantly increased from 30.2% of procedures in 2007 to 50.2% in 2014. The factors associated with imaging use included stable angina presentation (OR: 1.2; 95% CI :1.15-1.25; p<0.001), bifurcation LM disease (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14-1.30; p<0.001), previous PCI (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.22-1.32; p<0.001).  After propensity scoring was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances between groups, imaging guidance was strongly associated with a lower rate of coronary complications, fewer in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events, and 46% and 34% reductions in 30-day and 12-month mortality respectively. Greater mortality reductions were observed with higher operator LM PCI volume. In logistic regression modelling, imaging use was associated with improved 12-month survival.

CATHETER BASED VALVULAR INTERVENTION

Self-expandable or balloon-expandable TAVI?

Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. A propensity-Matched Comparison from the FRANCE-TAVI Registry.

Circ 2020; 141:243-59

There are very few randomized head-to-head trials comparing the balloon with the self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices. Despite the inherent differences in expansion mode, stent frame, and leaflet characteristics between the device types, which translate into some differences in hemodynamic function, paravalvular sealing, and periprocedural complications have been considered comparable. The FRANCE-TAVI  nationwide registry of 12,141 patients undergoing balloon-expandable (Edwards, n=8,038) or self-expandable (Medtronic, n=4,103) has reported on ≥ moderate paravalvular regurgitation, in-hospital mortality, and 2-year all-cause mortality. In propensity-matched analyses, the self-expandable cohort had higher rates of ≥ moderate paravalvular regurgitation (15.5% vs. 8.3%; RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.63-2.22; p<0.0001) and in-hospital mortality (5.6% vs. 4.2%; RR:1.34; 95% CI: 1.07-1.66; p=0.01). 2-year mortality was also higher in the self-expandable group (29.8% vs. 26.6%; HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.29; p=0.003).

The evolution of self-expandable TAVI

Three Generations of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves. A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:170-79

The ever-increasing improvements in transcatheter technology has advanced TAVI to equivalency or superiority to SAVR in multiple studies across the spectrum of surgical risk. The current report focuses on real-world data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry for patients undergoing TAVI with CoreValve, Evolut R, or Evolut PRO valves for the treatment of tricuspid aortic stenosis between January 2014 to September 2017. The valves analysed included the 23, 26, and 29mm sizes. Propensity matching was performed using the Evolut PRO group as the reference. In 18,874 patients undergoing TAVI, 5,514 patients received the CoreValve, 11, 295 Evolut R, and 2,065 Evolut PRO. At 30-days, there were fewer patients with more than mild AR for the unmatched (7.8% CoreValve, 5.2% Evolut R and 2.8% Evolut PRO; p<0.001) and matched populations (8.3% CoreValve, 5.4% Evolut R and 3.4% Evolut PRO; p=0.03). The mean aortic valve gradients at 30 days in the matched populations were <8 mmHg for all three valves (7.3 mmHg CoreValve, 7.5 mmHg Evolut R, and 7.2 mmHg Evolut PRO).

PARTNER-2 at 5 years

Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement.

NEJM 2020; 382:799-809

To be established as first line therapy for the treatment of symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis, TAVI must prove to be as effective as SAVR in the long term. The PARTNER 2 cohort A trial involved 2,032 patients who were stratified according to intended transfemoral or transthoracic access and randomly assigned to undergo TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIENT XT valve or SAVR. TAVR was found to be noninferior to SAVR with regards to the primary outcome of death from any cause or disabling stroke at 2 years. The investigators have now confirmed that at 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of death or disabling stroke between TAVI and SAVR (47.9% vs. 43.4%; HR: 1.09; 95% CI 0.95-1.25). A landmark analysis of events occurring between 2 and 5 years after the procedure showed a divergence of event rates in favour of surgery (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.06-1.53). This late increase in risk with TAVR has also been reported with the self-expanding TAVI valve. Other salient findings included greater paravalvular regurgitation in the TAVI group, patients in the TAVI group had nearly three times as many valve-related hospitalizations and required 21 aortic valve reinterventions as compared to 6 in the surgery group.

Optimal antithrombotic therapy in TAVI patients

Anticoagulation with or without clopidogrel after transcatheter aortic-valve implantation.

NEJM 2020; 382:1696-1707

Bleeding risk is particularly relevant in patients undergoing TAVI, especially those receiving oral anticoagulation, given the typical age of the patients, the frequent presence of comorbidities, and the use of large-bore access catheters. Expert opinion has indicated that administration of clopidogrel may reduce the risk of stroke and other embolic complications that are due in part to thrombus formation on the bioprosthetic valves. The POPular TAVI trial (cohort B) tested the hypothesis that in patients receiving anticoagulation, the use of oral anticoagulants alone would be safer (n=157) than oral anticoagulants plus 3 months of clopidogrel (n=156). The two coprimary endpoints of the trial were all bleeding and non-procedural related bleeding within 12 months after TAVI. Bleeding was lower in the anticoagulation only group (21.7% vs. 34.6%; RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.90; p=0.01). Most bleeding events were at the access site. Non-procedural related bleeding was also lower in the anticoagulation only group (21.7% vs. 34%; RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44-0.92; p=0.02). Important limitations of the study included the definitions used in the trial with bleeding occurring during TAVI or the index hospitalization being defined as non-procedure related even if it occurred at the access site. Details regarding baseline and procedural characteristics, including aspirin use, the specific direct-acting oral anticoagulant used by patients, and how often oral anticoagulants were withheld periprocedurally, are lacking.

TAVI for bicuspid aortic valve disease

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease. A Report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Valve Therapy Registry.

Circ 2020; 141:1071-79

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAVS) have been excluded from pivotal TAVI trials. The aim of the current study was to compare the outcomes of TAVI in patients with BAVS and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis (TAVS). There were 170,959 eligible procedures in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Valve Therapy Registry. Of these, 5,412 TAVI procedures were performed in patients with BAVS, including 3,705 with current generation devices. As compared to patients with TAVS, patients with BAVS were younger and had a lower STS score. With current generation devices, device success was 96.3%, and the incidence of 2+ AR was 2.7%. A lower 1-year adjusted risk of mortality was observed in patients with BAVS (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.99) whereas no difference was observed in the 1-year adjusted risk of stroke (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.94-1.39).

MISCELLANEOUS

Evolution of renal denervation for hypertension

Alcohol-Mediated Renal Denervation Using the Peregrine System Infusion Catheter for Treatment of Hypertension.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:471-84

The success of catheter-based renal denervation for the treatment of hypertension has remained variable. The Peregrine Catheter system has been developed to deliver small doses of pure dehydrated alcohol into the renal periadventitial space to ablate the afferent and efferent sympathetic nerve bundles. The current study examined the safety and efficacy of the infusion of 0.6ml of alcohol in 45 patients with uncontrolled hypertension taking 3 or more antihypertensive medications. Mean 24-hour ambulatory BP reduction at 6 months versus baseline was -11 mmHg for systolic BP and -7 mmHg for diastolic BP. Office systolic BP was reduced by -18/-10 mmHg at 6 months. Antihypertensive medications were reduced in 23% and increased in 5% of patients at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint, defined as the absence of periprocedural major vascular complications, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or death within 1 month was met in 96% of patients. Two patients developed access site pseudoaneurysms. There were no death or instances of MI, stroke, TIA, or renal artery stenosis. There were two cases of minor vessel dissection that resolved without treatment.

BP control without the pills?

Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial.

Lancet 2020; 395:1444-51

The SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED (SPYRAL Pivotal) trial was designed to assess the efficacy of renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medication. The study randomized 331 patients with office systolic blood pressure of 150-180 mmHg to either renal denervation or a sham procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was baseline adjusted change in 24-hour systolic BP and the secondary efficacy endpoint was baseline adjusted change in office systolic BP from baseline to 3 months after the procedure. The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were met, with posterior probability of superiority more than 0.999 for both. The treatment difference between the two groups for systolic BP was -3.9 mmHg and for office systolic BP  the difference was -6.5 mmHg. There were no major device-related or procedural related safety events up to 3 months after the procedure.

Very late stent outcomes

Stent-Related Adverse Events >1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

JACC 2020; 75:590-604

Many contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) trials have focused on 1-year outcomes. The frequency and predictors of stent-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after the first year have not been extensively studied. Individual patient data from patients involved in 19 prospective, randomized metallic stent trials were examined for the frequency and predictors of very-late stent-related events and MACE by stent type. Amongst 25,032 patients, 3718, 7934, and 13380 were treated with bare metal stents (BMS), first generation DES (DES1) and second generation DES (DES2) respectively. MACE rates within 1 year after PCI were progressively lower following treatment with BMS versus DES1 versus DES2 (17.9% vs. 8.2% vs. 5.1% respectively; p<0.0001). Between years 1 and 5, very late MACE occurred in 9.4% of patients including 2.9% cardiac death, 3.1% MI, and 5.1% ischemia driven target lesion revascularization. Very late MACE occurred in 9.7%, 11%, and 8.3% of patients treated with BMS, DES1 and DES2 respectively (p<0.0001), linearly increasing between 1 and 5 years. The use DES1, age, coronary risk factors such as diabetes and smoking, and variables associated with extensive disease (eg. previous revascularization, calcification, multivessel disease) were identified as predictors of very late events.

It’s all about risk factor modification

Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study.

Lancet 2020;395:795-808

The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study was designed to standardise the prospective measurement of the effects of 14 modifiable risk factors on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality across 21 countries categorised by different socio-economic strata. Between January 2005 to December 2016, investigators recruited 155,722 participants without a prior history of CVD who were then followed up for a median of 9.5 years. Behavioural risk factors were tobacco use, alcohol intake, diet quality, physical activity, and sodium intake. Metabolic risk factors included hypertension, dysglycaemia (or history of diabetes), non-HDL cholesterol, body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio as a surrogate of centripetal obesity. Education was the primary socioeconomic factor of interest. Symptoms of depression was measured as were grip strength and household and ambient air pollution. Important findings included a mean BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and non-HDL cholesterol greatest in high-income countries, prevalence of hypertension highest in middle-income countries, and diabetes found most often in low-income countries. Tobacco was most strongly associated with CVD, followed by physical activity and poor diet. Hypertension had a stronger association with CVD than diabetes, elevated non-HDL cholesterol and obesity. In the overall cohort, hypertension was the strongest risk factor for CVD, followed by high non-HDL cholesterol, household air pollution, tobacco use, poor diet, low education, abdominal obesity, and diabetes. Elevated non-HDL cholesterol was the largest risk factor for MI, followed by hypertension and smoking.

Simple measures to reduce radiation exposure

Effectiveness of additional x-ray protection devices in reducing scattered radiation in radial intervention: the ESPRESSO randomized trial.

EuroIntervention 2020 Online

The incidence of radiation associated pathology correlates with length of career and the complexity cases undertaken. Radiation protection practice and training varies considerably between different centres and countries. It is remarkable how simple alterations to practice, can reduce dose, not just to the operator but also to the other staff in the lab. Over a career, these measures make a big difference. Modern interventional trends such as increasing patient BMI, and case complexity are all associated with increased operator x-ray dose. The ESPRESSO trial compared three basic radiation protection measures in the context of radial arterial access. The trial randomised 600 patients undergoing radial access intervention, prospectively, to ‘Shield only’ – a 60*76 cm, 0.5mm Pb, ceiling mounted Mavig shield, ‘Shield + curtain’ – as above, plus an attached 0.5 Pb curtain underhanging the shield, and ‘Shield + curtain + drape’ – as above, plus a 75*40 cm 0.5 Pb drape positioned over the waist. The drape was custom made and covered the patient’s lower abdomen and groin area.  All strategies were all used alongside standard lead apron and thyroid collar. Outcome measures were the radiation dose to the first and second operator and the patient with analysis on an intention to treat basis. There was a mixture of interventional cases including PCI (in 53%), diagnostic studies, left ventriculography and a small percentage of right heart catheterisation and even biopsy.  No cases crossed over. Patient and case characteristics were well balanced between groups. There were no between-group differences in screening or procedure time. The key results were no statistically significant differences in patient dose-area product. As compared with group 1 (shield only), group 2 (+ curtain) was associated with non-significant 3% dose reduction for first operator and 17% dose reduction in the second operator. Group 3 (+ curtain and drape) had a significant 19% dose reduction for first operator and 39% reduction for second operator. Most centres will be familiar with the equipment used in groups 1 and 2 but may not utilise the drape over the patient’s waist. This appears to be a particularly inexpensive (reusable) and simple to use strategy associated with considerable benefit in every case performed.