AHP Working Group

Welcome to the AHP Working Group page

AHP Working Group Members

Dr Douglas Muir (Chair)
Sarah Callaghan
Jennifer Hemmings
Camilla Hodgson
Rizwan Rashid
Heidi Tumman
Richard Walters

Co-opted Members:
Sarah Carson (EuroPCR and EAPCI Link, BCIS Council co-opted AHP Member)
Ellie Gudde (Programme Committee)
Dr Damian Kelly (Medical Representative)
David Priscott (Programme Committee)
Catherine Theron (Programme Committee)
James Heppenstall (Programme Committee – AHP Summer Meeting, Sheffield 2019)
James Battye (Programme Committee – AHP Summer Meeting, Sheffield 2019)
Paul Cattell (Programme Committee – AHP Summer Meeting, Sheffield 2019)
Ann Matto (Programme Committee – AHP Summer Meeting, Sheffield 2019)


CPD Audit

All AHPS are required to maintain their own records of CPD. The Working Group have experienced people who can help you through the audit process.

CPD specific-links by profession

Nursing and Midwifery Council – Professional Development

Registration Council for Clinical Physiologists – CPD
Society for Cardiological Science & Technology – CPD


Re-registration for radiographers

In common with many other allied health professions (AHPs), radiographers must be registered with the Health Professions Council (HPC) in order to practise within the UK. Registration lasts for two years and renewal falls on the last day of February. The next such date is therefore 28th February 2014.

For radiographers who work within cardiac catheter labs, re-application is relatively straightforward. There are instructions to follow in the reminder letter. There are two exceptions to this rule.
– If you have changed address since the previous occasion and have not informed the HPC. This means that a reminder letter may not arrive. Unfortunately I do not intend to cover this event within this article.
– A proportion of registrants are requested to provide evidence of continuous professional development (CPD) before registration is granted.

By virtue of this piece, I propose to address the sinking feeling that is associated with ‘selection’ for CPD assessment. I write with the retrospective advantage of having been selected myself in 2012.

The first portion of advice is not to panic.

Next, look for the HPC’s website and seek out their help. Visit https://www.hcpc-uk.org/ and go to the CPD section https://www.hcpc-uk.org/cpd/. This page explains the process clearly and without being unnecessarily complicated. How to complete your CPD profile can be found at https://www.hcpc-uk.org/cpd/cpd-audits/completing-a-cpd-profile/

There are also two examples of operational job roles that could be submitted by radiographers to reflect the CPD opportunities within their day-to-day job. For myself, the “superintendent radiographer” was the template that I followed – https://www.hcpc-uk.org/globalassets/cpd/sample-profiles/superintendent-radiographer.pdf. There is also one for a “diagnostic radiographer” https://www.hcpc-uk.org/globalassets/cpd/sample-profiles/diagnostic-radiographer.pdf. In cardiology, this would pertain to any radiographer not in a managerial or supervisory position.

I found it relatively easy (but tedious) to change the job role description to match my own. Fortunately for me, there is a significant element of training and teaching within my normal role. Whether or not this is the case, the gathering and presentation of ‘evidence’ is key to surviving the process. It is a good idea to use the HPC’s form for this http://www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/10003BC3HCPCCPDProfileWEB2012.doc.

It is made clear throughout the above documents that your name should not appear on the evidence that you produce. Instead, you are directed to use a personal “CPD number”, which is allocated at the time that you are referred for assessment of CPD.

Evidence may be forwarded either as email or overland mail.

I found the option for email to be a Godsend. Many of my CPD documents had been emailed to me and I still keep all such emails in a file called (funnily enough) “CPD”. This meant that I did not have to scan these documents, but merely take them from the emails and attach them to my emailed response.

For all certificates or other physical evidence, you will need to find a scanner. As the maximum size of emailed evidence is 10MB, it is helpful to reduce the resolution of the scanned images to the lowest legible level.

If you prefer to post the data, please remember to keep it concise and not to use plastic wallets or staples. Apparently, these may somehow cause the assessor to spontaneously combust.

I hope that these pointers can help colleagues who need to go through this particular mill. I should be most grateful if anyone who has attempted to follow the above guidelines could let the BCIS AHP Group how they get on (email: bcis@bcs.com). All suggested improvements will be gratefully received.

Bryan Walker
Clinical Lead Radiographer
Manchester Heart Centre
Manchester Royal Infirmary
June 2013

British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging – Accreditation
Society and College of Radiographers – CPD

Admission of patients to the Cardiac Catheter Laboratory

Admission of patients to the Cardiac Catheter Laboratory

127.99 Kb


117.23 Kb

Communication with relatives

130.11 Kb

Diagnostic Angiography

116.58 Kb


128.41 Kb

Femoral Artery Puncture Management

203.18 Kb

Inter Department Transfer

120.04 Kb

Pulmonary Oedema

173.11 Kb

WHO surgical safety checklist

435.12 Kb